PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HSH.TO vs. USCC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HSH.TO vs. USCC.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

HSH.TO (Global X S&P 500 CAD Hedged Index Corporate Class ETF) and USCC.TO (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HSH.TO is a S&P 500 fund actively managed by Global X, while USCC.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSH.TO returned 11.71%/yr vs 12.45%/yr for USCC.TO. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HSH.TO vs. USCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 CAD Hedged Index Corporate Class ETF (HSH.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSH.TO achieves a 9.63% return, which is significantly lower than USCC.TO's 11.79% return.

HSH.TO

1D
0.10%
1M
0.05%
6M
8.63%
YTD
9.63%
1Y
19.57%
3Y*
18.33%
5Y*
11.71%
10Y*
—

USCC.TO

1D
0.05%
1M
1.11%
6M
9.29%
YTD
11.79%
1Y
22.33%
3Y*
18.40%
5Y*
12.45%
10Y*
12.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSH.TO vs. USCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HSH.TO
Global X S&P 500 CAD Hedged Index Corporate Class ETF		9.63%15.34%23.32%25.56%-19.90%28.94%16.14%17.33%
USCC.TO
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF		11.79%9.19%31.45%17.35%-8.49%21.99%11.29%10.68%

Correlation

The correlation between HSH.TO and USCC.TO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2019

0.47

Over the past year, HSH.TO and USCC.TO have become more correlated (0.78) than their long-term average of 0.47, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X S&P 500 CAD Hedged Index Corporate Class ETF

Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF

Often compared with USCC.TO:
USCC.TO vs. VFV.TOUSCC.TO vs. SPYIUSCC.TO vs. TGED.TOUSCC.TO vs. USCL.TOUSCC.TO vs. RSPAUSCC.TO vs. ZSP-U.TOUSCC.TO vs. ESG.TO

Return for Risk

HSH.TO vs. USCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HSH.TO
HSH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HSH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
HSH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
USCC.TO
USCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
USCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
USCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSH.TO vs. USCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 CAD Hedged Index Corporate Class ETF (HSH.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

HSH.TOUSCC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.54
2.23

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.19
3.11

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.43

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

3.34

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.81

13.51

-4.69

HSH.TO vs. USCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the USCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSH.TO and USCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HSH.TO vs. USCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSH.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.19%, which is greater than USCC.TO's maximum drawdown of -28.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSH.TO and USCC.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HSH.TOUSCC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.19%

-28.40%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

-6.71%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.04%

-17.55%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.26%

-17.55%

-7.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-28.40%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.76%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-3.14%

-2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

1.66%

+0.57%

Volatility

HSH.TO vs. USCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P 500 CAD Hedged Index Corporate Class ETF (HSH.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.77% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCC.TO) at 2.70%. This indicates that HSH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HSH.TOUSCC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

2.70%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

8.29%

+1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.78%

10.04%

+2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.78%

13.84%

+3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.11%

14.55%

+5.56%

Dividends

HSH.TO vs. USCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

HSH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.49%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSH.TO
Global X S&P 500 CAD Hedged Index Corporate Class ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USCC.TO
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF		9.49%10.20%9.86%11.45%10.42%5.05%5.17%5.16%6.19%5.56%5.59%5.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

HSH.TO and USCC.TO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HSH.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while USCC.TO is Derivative Income.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSH.TO and USCC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer