HSH.TO vs. CHPS.TO
HSH.TO (Global X S&P 500 CAD Hedged Index Corporate Class ETF) and CHPS.TO (Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HSH.TO is a S&P 500 fund actively managed by Global X, while CHPS.TO is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index. HSH.TO is actively managed, while CHPS.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSH.TO returned 11.71%/yr vs 29.09%/yr for CHPS.TO. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
HSH.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSH.TO achieves a 9.63% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS.TO's 56.69% return.
HSH.TO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 8.63%
- YTD
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 19.57%
- 3Y*
- 18.33%
- 5Y*
- 11.71%
- 10Y*
- —
CHPS.TO
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -6.66%
- 6M
- 46.63%
- YTD
- 56.69%
- 1Y
- 89.48%
- 3Y*
- 45.32%
- 5Y*
- 29.09%
- 10Y*
- —
HSH.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSH.TO Global X S&P 500 CAD Hedged Index Corporate Class ETF | 9.63% | 15.34% | 23.32% | 25.56% | -19.90% | 13.52% |
CHPS.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF | 56.69% | 45.93% | 20.38% | 68.20% | -37.86% | 23.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSH.TO and CHPS.TO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2021 | 0.68 |
The correlation between HSH.TO and CHPS.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSH.TO vs. CHPS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HSH.TO
CHPS.TO
HSH.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 CAD Hedged Index Corporate Class ETF (HSH.TO) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HSH.TO | CHPS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.38 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 6.81 | -4.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.81 | 18.24 | -9.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HSH.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSH.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.19%, smaller than the maximum CHPS.TO drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSH.TO and CHPS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSH.TO | CHPS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.19% | -48.16% | +13.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -13.35% | +3.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.04% | -37.49% | +17.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.26% | -48.16% | +22.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -9.95% | +9.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -13.74% | +8.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 4.96% | -2.73% |
Volatility
HSH.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 CAD Hedged Index Corporate Class ETF (HSH.TO) is 3.77%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) has a volatility of 17.48%. This indicates that HSH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSH.TO | CHPS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 17.48% | -13.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.21% | 31.69% | -21.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.78% | 37.90% | -25.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 35.22% | -17.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.11% | 35.08% | -14.97% |
Dividends
HSH.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Dividend Comparison
HSH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.20% | 0.53% | 0.97% | 0.01% |
HSH.TO Global X S&P 500 CAD Hedged Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSH.TO and CHPS.TO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HSH.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while CHPS.TO is Semiconductors.
Find the right allocation for HSH.TO and CHPS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer