HSGFX vs. WRAIX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

HSGFX (Hussman Strategic Growth Fund) and WRAIX (Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 10 years, HSGFX returned -2.22%/yr vs 5.41%/yr for WRAIX. Their -0.52 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. HSGFX charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.24%/yr for WRAIX.

Performance

HSGFX vs. WRAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX) and Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSGFX achieves a -5.27% return, which is significantly lower than WRAIX's 4.38% return. Over the past 10 years, HSGFX has underperformed WRAIX with an annualized return of -2.22%, while WRAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.41% annualized return.

HSGFX

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: 3.85%
• 6M: -3.58%
• YTD: -5.27%
• 1Y: -10.47%
• 3Y*: -2.65%
• 5Y*: -1.91%
• 10Y*: -2.22%
• ALL TIME*: 0.22%

WRAIX

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 0.60%
• 6M: 2.67%
• YTD: 4.38%
• 1Y: 7.86%
• 3Y*: 8.06%
• 5Y*: 5.31%
• 10Y*: 5.41%
• ALL TIME*: 4.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HSGFX Hussman Strategic Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
WRAIX Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

HSGFX vs. WRAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HSGFX Hussman Strategic Growth Fund	-5.27%	6.24%	-6.99%	-11.60%	17.33%	-0.23%	14.52%	-18.87%	8.78%	-12.72%
WRAIX Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund	4.38%	9.13%	7.74%	7.73%	-3.41%	6.52%	1.04%	12.34%	-2.67%	9.75%

Correlation

The correlation between HSGFX and WRAIX is -0.46, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.46
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	-0.49
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	-0.56
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	-0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2012	-0.52

The correlation between HSGFX and WRAIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.56 (5 years) to -0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HSGFX vs. WRAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HSGFX

HSGFX Risk / Return Rank: 1
HSGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
HSGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
HSGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
HSGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
HSGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

WRAIX

WRAIX Risk / Return Rank: 35
WRAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
WRAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
WRAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
WRAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
WRAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HSGFX vs. WRAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX) and Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HSGFX	WRAIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.71	1.18	-1.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.99	1.74	-2.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.24	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.53	1.46	-2.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.97	6.06	-7.03

HSGFX vs. WRAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSGFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is lower than the WRAIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSGFX and WRAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HSGFX vs. WRAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSGFX drawdown since its inception was -60.61%, which is greater than WRAIX's maximum drawdown of -15.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSGFX and WRAIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HSGFX	WRAIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.61%	-15.44%	-45.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.20%	-5.03%	-12.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.52%	-5.03%	-19.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.52%	-9.24%	-15.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.86%	-15.44%	-15.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.87%	-0.27%	-54.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.04%	-1.96%	-25.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.44%	1.21%	+8.23%

Volatility

HSGFX vs. WRAIX - Volatility Comparison

Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX) at 1.40%. This indicates that HSGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WRAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HSGFX	WRAIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.49%	1.40%	+2.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.40%	5.11%	+5.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.89%	6.25%	+6.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.43%	6.52%	+4.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.90%	6.76%	+4.14%

HSGFX vs. WRAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSGFX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than WRAIX's 1.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

HSGFX vs. WRAIX - Dividend Comparison

HSGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than WRAIX's 0.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HSGFX Hussman Strategic Growth Fund	2.46%	2.33%	3.00%	3.10%	1.08%	0.42%	0.16%	1.84%	1.19%	0.50%	0.28%	0.56%
WRAIX Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund	0.17%	0.17%	1.47%	1.31%	2.77%	0.52%	1.98%	1.15%	1.25%	1.15%	0.30%	2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HSGFX and WRAIX in my portfolio?

HSGFX and WRAIX have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HSGFX or WRAIX?

HSGFX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to WRAIX (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSGFX dropped -60.61% vs WRAIX's -15.44%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WRAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.