PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HSEF.L vs. UC79.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HSEF.L vs. UC79.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HSEF.L (HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD) and UC79.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, from HSBC and UBS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSEF.L returned 7.39%/yr vs 10.24%/yr for UC79.L. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HSEF.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for UC79.L.

Performance

HSEF.L vs. UC79.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSEF.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HSEF.L is traded in GBP, while UC79.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UC79.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSEF.L achieves a 15.11% return, which is significantly lower than UC79.L's 33.24% return.

HSEF.L

1D
-0.64%
1M
3.00%
YTD
15.11%
6M
15.45%
1Y
38.19%
3Y*
17.57%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
—

UC79.L

1D
-1.64%
1M
8.63%
YTD
33.24%
6M
35.28%
1Y
64.62%
3Y*
24.35%
5Y*
10.24%
10Y*
10.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSEF.L vs. UC79.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HSEF.L
HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD		15.11%20.85%17.02%-1.33%-8.36%1.82%11.41%
UC79.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis		33.24%26.95%10.88%1.14%-11.74%0.32%17.08%

Correlation

The correlation between HSEF.L and UC79.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2020

0.91

The correlation between HSEF.L and UC79.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

HSEF.L vs. UC79.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
HSEF.L
UC79.L

Technology

40.2%
38.0%

Financial Services

21.2%
22.6%

Basic Materials

9.3%
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
11.0%

Industrials

4.8%
8.3%

Energy

4.2%
0.2%

Healthcare

4.0%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
2.8%

Communication Services

2.7%
8.0%

Utilities

1.1%
1.0%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.3%

Technology

HSEF.L
40.2%
UC79.L
38.0%

Financial Services

HSEF.L
21.2%
UC79.L
22.6%

Basic Materials

HSEF.L
9.3%
UC79.L
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

HSEF.L
9.2%
UC79.L
11.0%

Industrials

HSEF.L
4.8%
UC79.L
8.3%

Energy

HSEF.L
4.2%
UC79.L
0.2%

Healthcare

HSEF.L
4.0%
UC79.L
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

HSEF.L
2.9%
UC79.L
2.8%

Communication Services

HSEF.L
2.7%
UC79.L
8.0%

Utilities

HSEF.L
1.1%
UC79.L
1.0%

Real Estate

HSEF.L
0.6%
UC79.L
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis

Often compared with HSEF.L:
HSEF.L vs. EMVL.LHSEF.L vs. EMQQHSEF.L vs. XZEM.DEHSEF.L vs. EMIM.LHSEF.L vs. WLDS.LHSEF.L vs. GLDHSEF.L vs. HDEM.L
Often compared with UC79.L:
UC79.L vs. HMEF.LUC79.L vs. EMV.LUC79.L vs. COPPUC79.L vs. V3AB.LUC79.L vs. HDEM.LUC79.L vs. EUFM.LUC79.L vs. 5ESG.L

Return for Risk

HSEF.L vs. UC79.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HSEF.L
HSEF.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
HSEF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSEF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSEF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HSEF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSEF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
UC79.L
UC79.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
UC79.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC79.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC79.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
UC79.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC79.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSEF.L vs. UC79.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSEF.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HSEF.LUC79.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.58
1.44

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.35
2.27

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.57

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

2.48

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.29

4.47

+8.82

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HSEF.L vs. UC79.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSEF.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the UC79.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSEF.L and UC79.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HSEF.LUC79.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

1.44

+1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.41

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.42

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.15

+0.45

Drawdowns

HSEF.L vs. UC79.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSEF.L drawdown since its inception was -23.33%, smaller than the maximum UC79.L drawdown of -53.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSEF.L and UC79.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HSEF.LUC79.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.33%

-53.04%

+29.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-25.91%

+16.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

-25.91%

+10.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.36%

-25.91%

+6.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-39.46%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.81%

-2.45%

+0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.31%

-21.80%

+12.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

14.42%

-11.55%

Volatility

HSEF.L vs. UC79.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSEF.L) is 5.49%, while UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L) has a volatility of 8.44%. This indicates that HSEF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC79.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HSEF.LUC79.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

8.44%

-2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.66%

15.21%

-3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.77%

44.59%

-29.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.64%

24.99%

-9.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.71%

25.01%

-9.30%

HSEF.L vs. UC79.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSEF.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than UC79.L's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HSEF.L vs. UC79.L - Dividend Comparison

HSEF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UC79.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSEF.L
HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC79.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis		1.59%2.14%1.79%2.38%2.06%1.35%1.81%2.11%2.11%1.97%2.15%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

HSEF.L and UC79.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HSEF.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HSEF.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for UC79.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for HSEF.L and 0.27% for UC79.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSEF.L and UC79.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer