HSEF.L vs. EMIM.L
Compare and contrast key facts about HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSEF.L) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L).
HSEF.L and EMIM.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HSEF.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Aug 27, 2020. EMIM.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on May 30, 2014. Both HSEF.L and EMIM.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HSEF.L or EMIM.L.
Correlation
The correlation between HSEF.L and EMIM.L is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
HSEF.L vs. EMIM.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
HSEF.L:
1.40
EMIM.L:
0.99
HSEF.L:
2.04
EMIM.L:
1.44
HSEF.L:
1.26
EMIM.L:
1.18
HSEF.L:
1.18
EMIM.L:
0.92
HSEF.L:
6.55
EMIM.L:
3.91
HSEF.L:
2.98%
EMIM.L:
3.18%
HSEF.L:
13.88%
EMIM.L:
12.55%
HSEF.L:
-23.33%
EMIM.L:
-31.70%
HSEF.L:
-0.59%
EMIM.L:
-1.83%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HSEF.L having a 4.29% return and EMIM.L slightly lower at 4.26%.
HSEF.L
4.29%
0.60%
11.20%
20.09%
N/A
N/A
EMIM.L
4.26%
1.14%
5.79%
12.88%
4.64%
6.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HSEF.L vs. EMIM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both HSEF.L and EMIM.L have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HSEF.L vs. EMIM.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
HSEF.L
EMIM.L
HSEF.L vs. EMIM.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSEF.L) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HSEF.L vs. EMIM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither HSEF.L nor EMIM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
HSEF.L vs. EMIM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSEF.L drawdown since its inception was -23.33%, smaller than the maximum EMIM.L drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSEF.L and EMIM.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HSEF.L vs. EMIM.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSEF.L) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) at 3.39%. This indicates that HSEF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMIM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.