HSBH vs. KBWP

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

HSBH (HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF) and KBWP (Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - HSBH tracks the HSBC Holdings plc Local Shares Total Return while KBWP tracks the KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, HSBH returned 60.04% vs -1.97% for KBWP. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HSBH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for KBWP.

Performance

HSBH vs. KBWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF (HSBH) and Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSBH achieves a 19.58% return, which is significantly higher than KBWP's -4.54% return.

HSBH

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: 1.73%
• YTD: 19.58%
• 6M: 30.69%
• 1Y: 60.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KBWP

• 1D: 3.37%
• 1M: 1.98%
• YTD: -4.54%
• 6M: 0.76%
• 1Y: -1.97%
• 3Y*: 16.09%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: 11.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSBH vs. KBWP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HSBH HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF	19.58%	40.02%
KBWP Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF	-4.54%	8.30%

Correlation

The correlation between HSBH and KBWP is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025	0.16

HSBH vs. KBWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HSBH	KBWP
Financial Services	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HSBH vs. KBWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSBH

HSBH Risk / Return Rank: 84
HSBH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
HSBH Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
HSBH Omega Ratio Rank: 84
HSBH Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
HSBH Martin Ratio Rank: 82

KBWP

KBWP Risk / Return Rank: 8
KBWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
KBWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
KBWP Omega Ratio Rank: 8
KBWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
KBWP Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSBH vs. KBWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF (HSBH) and Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HSBH	KBWP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.64	-0.06	+2.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.42	0.02	+3.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.00	+0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.07	-0.11	+4.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.96	-0.23	+15.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HSBH vs. KBWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSBH Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the KBWP Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSBH and KBWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HSBH	KBWP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.64	-0.06	+2.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.62	0.71	+1.92

Drawdowns

HSBH vs. KBWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSBH drawdown since its inception was -14.81%, smaller than the maximum KBWP drawdown of -39.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSBH and KBWP.

Drawdown Indicators

	HSBH	KBWP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.81%	-39.76%	+24.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.81%	-9.56%	-5.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.29%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.00%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.52%	-5.33%	+1.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.34%	-4.37%	+2.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.02%	4.57%	-0.55%

Volatility

HSBH vs. KBWP - Volatility Comparison

HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF (HSBH) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) at 5.50%. This indicates that HSBH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KBWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HSBH	KBWP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.52%	5.50%	+1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.58%	11.95%	+6.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.83%	16.53%	+6.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.43%	18.59%	+3.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.43%	20.72%	+1.71%

HSBH vs. KBWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSBH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than KBWP's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

HSBH vs. KBWP - Dividend Comparison

HSBH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than KBWP's 1.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HSBH HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KBWP Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF	1.94%	1.58%	1.64%	1.68%	1.99%	3.02%	1.93%	1.99%	2.11%	1.90%	2.14%	1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HSBH and KBWP in my portfolio?

HSBH and KBWP have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HSBH or KBWP?

HSBH has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to KBWP (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSBH dropped -14.81% vs KBWP's -39.76%.

Which ETF is better, HSBH or KBWP?

On 1-year performance, HSBH leads with 60.04% vs -1.97% for KBWP. On fees, HSBH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, KBWP has been the lower-risk option at 5.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HSBH or KBWP?

Over the 1-year period, HSBH has performed better with a 60.04% return vs -1.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HSBH or KBWP?

HSBH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for KBWP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HSBH or KBWP?

KBWP has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.34% for HSBH.

What is the main difference between HSBH and KBWP?

HSBH tracks HSBC Holdings plc Local Shares Total Return, while KBWP tracks KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR). They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for HSBH and 0.35% for KBWP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HSBH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.