HSBH vs. FBCG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

HSBH (HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF) and FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HSBH is a Financials Equities fund tracking the HSBC Holdings plc Local Shares Total Return, while FBCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. HSBH is passively managed, while FBCG is actively managed. Over the past year, HSBH returned 72.58% vs 35.82% for FBCG. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HSBH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FBCG.

Performance

HSBH vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF (HSBH) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSBH achieves a 27.53% return, which is significantly higher than FBCG's 13.26% return.

HSBH

• 1D: 1.05%
• 1M: 6.19%
• YTD: 27.53%
• 6M: 27.32%
• 1Y: 72.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBCG

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 1.35%
• YTD: 13.26%
• 6M: 12.97%
• 1Y: 35.82%
• 3Y*: 28.79%
• 5Y*: 14.21%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSBH vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HSBH HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF	27.53%	39.95%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	13.26%	46.90%

Correlation

The correlation between HSBH and FBCG is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025	0.43

HSBH vs. FBCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HSBH	FBCG
Financial Services	97.4%	2.2%
Basic Materials	-	0.5%
Communication Services	-	17.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	17.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.3%
Energy	-	0.4%
Healthcare	-	5.6%
Industrials	-	5.6%
Real Estate	-	0.6%
Technology	-	48.9%
Utilities	-	0.5%

Return for Risk

HSBH vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSBH

HSBH Risk / Return Rank: 89
HSBH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
HSBH Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
HSBH Omega Ratio Rank: 88
HSBH Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
HSBH Martin Ratio Rank: 87

FBCG

FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 53
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSBH vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF (HSBH) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HSBH	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.09	1.83	+1.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.86	2.46	+1.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.32	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.93	2.37	+2.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.86	8.97	+8.89

HSBH vs. FBCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSBH Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is higher than the FBCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSBH and FBCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HSBH vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSBH drawdown since its inception was -14.81%, smaller than the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSBH and FBCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	HSBH	FBCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.81%	-43.56%	+28.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.81%	-15.17%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.89%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.04%	+3.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.34%	-11.42%	+9.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.08%	4.00%	+0.08%

Volatility

HSBH vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison

HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF (HSBH) has a higher volatility of 8.19% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) at 7.75%. This indicates that HSBH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HSBH	FBCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.19%	7.75%	+0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.28%	15.30%	+3.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.67%	19.67%	+4.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.91%	25.97%	-3.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.91%	25.78%	-2.87%

HSBH vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSBH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

HSBH vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

HSBH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than FBCG's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.12%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%
HSBH HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF	2.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HSBH and FBCG in my portfolio?

HSBH and FBCG have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HSBH or FBCG?

HSBH has higher volatility (8.19%) compared to FBCG (7.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSBH dropped -14.81% vs FBCG's -43.56%.

Which ETF is better, HSBH or FBCG?

On 1-year performance, HSBH leads with 72.58% vs 35.82% for FBCG. On fees, HSBH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FBCG has been the lower-risk option at 7.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HSBH or FBCG?

Over the 1-year period, HSBH has performed better with a 72.58% return vs 35.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HSBH or FBCG?

HSBH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FBCG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HSBH or FBCG?

HSBH has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 0.04% for FBCG.

What is the main difference between HSBH and FBCG?

HSBH is categorized as Financials Equities, while FBCG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for HSBH and 0.59% for FBCG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HSBH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.