PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSAFX vs. GTAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSAFX vs. GTAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX) and Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund (GTAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSAFX achieves a -1.90% return, which is significantly lower than GTAIX's 12.59% return.


HSAFX

1D
-0.31%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
-1.90%
6M
-1.33%
1Y
-0.99%
3Y*
3.51%
5Y*
1.75%
10Y*

GTAIX

1D
0.78%
1M
3.45%
YTD
12.59%
6M
13.16%
1Y
22.76%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
7.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSAFX vs. GTAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HSAFX
Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund
-1.90%7.78%1.74%0.65%4.42%7.23%11.20%-0.37%
GTAIX
Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund
12.59%13.49%8.39%15.59%-14.49%9.25%-0.10%6.53%

Correlation

The correlation between HSAFX and GTAIX is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2019

0.25

The correlation between HSAFX and GTAIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.29 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSAFX vs. GTAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSAFX
HSAFX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
HSAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
HSAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

GTAIX
GTAIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
GTAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GTAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSAFX vs. GTAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX) and Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund (GTAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSAFXGTAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.55

-0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

5.19

-5.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.63

22.04

-22.67

HSAFX vs. GTAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSAFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the GTAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSAFX and GTAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSAFXGTAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

2.88

-3.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.66

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.50

+0.37

Drawdowns

HSAFX vs. GTAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSAFX drawdown since its inception was -5.54%, smaller than the maximum GTAIX drawdown of -24.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSAFX and GTAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSAFXGTAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-24.25%

+18.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.34%

-4.51%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.34%

-11.89%

+6.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.54%

-19.43%

+13.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.15%

0.00%

-4.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.56%

-4.82%

+3.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

1.06%

+0.83%

Volatility

HSAFX vs. GTAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX) is 1.70%, while Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund (GTAIX) has a volatility of 2.73%. This indicates that HSAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSAFXGTAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

2.73%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.68%

6.81%

-3.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.59%

8.14%

-2.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.86%

10.72%

-5.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.12%

11.50%

-6.38%

HSAFX vs. GTAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSAFX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GTAIX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

HSAFX vs. GTAIX - Dividend Comparison

HSAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than GTAIX's 4.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GTAIX
Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund
4.90%5.82%3.38%2.69%1.65%2.35%0.82%1.77%1.92%
HSAFX
Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund
1.80%1.90%2.15%1.60%19.12%3.37%5.55%0.03%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HSAFX and GTAIX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTAIX has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to HSAFX (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSAFX dropped -5.54% vs GTAIX's -24.25%.

GTAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSAFX and GTAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer