HSAFX vs. GPIFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HSAFX (Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund) and GPIFX (GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, HSAFX returned 1.75%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GPIFX. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HSAFX charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GPIFX.

Performance

HSAFX vs. GPIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX) and GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund (GPIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSAFX achieves a -1.90% return, which is significantly lower than GPIFX's 2.20% return.

HSAFX

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -0.82%
• YTD: -1.90%
• 6M: -1.33%
• 1Y: -0.99%
• 3Y*: 3.51%
• 5Y*: 1.75%
• 10Y*: —

GPIFX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 2.20%
• 6M: 2.40%
• 1Y: 6.75%
• 3Y*: 4.81%
• 5Y*: 0.49%
• 10Y*: 2.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSAFX vs. GPIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HSAFX Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund	-1.90%	7.78%	1.74%	0.65%	4.42%	7.23%	11.20%	-0.37%
GPIFX GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund	2.20%	3.69%	4.22%	7.13%	-14.14%	1.17%	15.17%	-2.40%

Correlation

The correlation between HSAFX and GPIFX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2019	0.22

Return for Risk

HSAFX vs. GPIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSAFX

HSAFX Risk / Return Rank: 2
HSAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
HSAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
HSAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
HSAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
HSAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

GPIFX

GPIFX Risk / Return Rank: 87
GPIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
GPIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
GPIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
GPIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
GPIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSAFX vs. GPIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX) and GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund (GPIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HSAFX	GPIFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.21	2.82	-3.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.27	4.13	-4.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.63	-0.66
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.22	4.01	-4.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.63	18.30	-18.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HSAFX vs. GPIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSAFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the GPIFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSAFX and GPIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HSAFX	GPIFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21	2.82	-3.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.10	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	0.47	+0.41

Drawdowns

HSAFX vs. GPIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSAFX drawdown since its inception was -5.54%, smaller than the maximum GPIFX drawdown of -16.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSAFX and GPIFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HSAFX	GPIFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.54%	-16.72%	+11.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.34%	-1.69%	-3.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.34%	-4.14%	-1.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-5.54%	-16.72%	+11.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-16.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.15%	-0.20%	-3.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.56%	-4.03%	+2.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	0.37%	+1.52%

Volatility

HSAFX vs. GPIFX - Volatility Comparison

Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX) has a higher volatility of 1.70% compared to GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund (GPIFX) at 0.77%. This indicates that HSAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HSAFX	GPIFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.70%	0.77%	+0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.68%	1.96%	+1.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.59%	2.41%	+3.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.86%	4.79%	+0.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.12%	5.32%	-0.20%

HSAFX vs. GPIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSAFX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIFX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

HSAFX vs. GPIFX - Dividend Comparison

HSAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than GPIFX's 4.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GPIFX GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund	4.56%	5.15%	5.18%	4.86%	1.96%	3.10%	2.62%	3.73%	3.46%	3.90%	1.97%	1.24%
HSAFX Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund	1.80%	1.90%	2.15%	1.60%	19.12%	3.37%	5.55%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HSAFX and GPIFX in my portfolio?

HSAFX and GPIFX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HSAFX or GPIFX?

HSAFX has higher volatility (1.70%) compared to GPIFX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSAFX dropped -5.54% vs GPIFX's -16.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.