HRSTX vs. BUIGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HRSTX (Rational Tactical Return Fund) and BUIGX (Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund) are both Options Trading funds. Over the past 5 years, HRSTX returned 5.10%/yr vs 9.28%/yr for BUIGX. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HRSTX charges 1.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUIGX.

Performance

HRSTX vs. BUIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rational Tactical Return Fund (HRSTX) and Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund (BUIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRSTX achieves a 5.82% return, which is significantly lower than BUIGX's 6.34% return.

HRSTX

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 2.21%
• YTD: 5.82%
• 6M: 5.96%
• 1Y: 8.02%
• 3Y*: 5.39%
• 5Y*: 5.10%
• 10Y*: 5.70%

BUIGX

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 2.01%
• YTD: 6.34%
• 6M: 6.77%
• 1Y: 17.59%
• 3Y*: 14.44%
• 5Y*: 9.28%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HRSTX vs. BUIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HRSTX Rational Tactical Return Fund	5.82%	3.66%	3.23%	5.06%	5.90%	3.95%	2.65%	8.35%	9.66%	2.49%
BUIGX Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund	6.34%	11.51%	15.54%	19.05%	-9.88%	12.51%	10.57%	17.71%	-2.19%	11.41%

Correlation

The correlation between HRSTX and BUIGX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.19

Over the past year, HRSTX and BUIGX have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.19, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

HRSTX vs. BUIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRSTX

HRSTX Risk / Return Rank: 80
HRSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
HRSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
HRSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
HRSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
HRSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

BUIGX

BUIGX Risk / Return Rank: 65
BUIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
BUIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
BUIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
BUIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
BUIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HRSTX vs. BUIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rational Tactical Return Fund (HRSTX) and Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund (BUIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HRSTX	BUIGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	1.93	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.53	2.76	+0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.78	1.45	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	3.45	-0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.53	17.58	+5.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HRSTX vs. BUIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRSTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the BUIGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRSTX and BUIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HRSTX	BUIGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.29	1.93	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.54	0.81	+0.73
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.81	-0.78

Drawdowns

HRSTX vs. BUIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRSTX drawdown since its inception was -69.69%, which is greater than BUIGX's maximum drawdown of -22.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRSTX and BUIGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HRSTX	BUIGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.69%	-22.01%	-47.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.42%	-5.12%	+2.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.42%	-13.94%	+11.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-2.42%	-15.22%	+12.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-15.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.83%	-0.17%	-8.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.59%	-2.32%	-29.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.34%	1.00%	-0.66%

Volatility

HRSTX vs. BUIGX - Volatility Comparison

Rational Tactical Return Fund (HRSTX) has a higher volatility of 1.39% compared to Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund (BUIGX) at 1.03%. This indicates that HRSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HRSTX	BUIGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.39%	1.03%	+0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.42%	7.94%	-4.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.51%	9.17%	-5.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.33%	11.53%	-8.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.16%	11.69%	-4.53%

HRSTX vs. BUIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRSTX has a 1.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BUIGX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

HRSTX vs. BUIGX - Dividend Comparison

HRSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.94%, while BUIGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BUIGX Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.32%	0.68%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HRSTX Rational Tactical Return Fund	8.94%	6.72%	4.47%	5.60%	2.24%	3.75%	2.10%	3.36%	1.33%	5.55%	13.80%	4.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HRSTX and BUIGX in my portfolio?

HRSTX and BUIGX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HRSTX or BUIGX?

HRSTX has higher volatility (1.39%) compared to BUIGX (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRSTX dropped -69.69% vs BUIGX's -22.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HRSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.