PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HRSMX vs. GSIKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HRSMX vs. GSIKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hood River Small-Cap Growth Fund (HRSMX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund (GSIKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRSMX achieves a 20.60% return, which is significantly higher than GSIKX's 16.05% return. Over the past 10 years, HRSMX has outperformed GSIKX with an annualized return of 18.21%, while GSIKX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.55% annualized return.


HRSMX

1D
3.85%
1M
-8.62%
6M
11.76%
YTD
20.60%
1Y
48.75%
3Y*
27.17%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
18.21%
ALL TIME*
13.40%

GSIKX

1D
2.40%
1M
2.44%
6M
10.48%
YTD
16.05%
1Y
32.30%
3Y*
20.28%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
11.55%
ALL TIME*
5.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

HRSMX vs. GSIKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HRSMX
Hood River Small-Cap Growth Fund
20.60%23.85%35.48%21.52%-27.99%23.19%60.80%24.13%-6.91%20.60%
GSIKX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund
16.05%34.30%8.81%17.60%-7.93%13.66%2.59%26.92%-12.12%26.53%

Correlation

The correlation between HRSMX and GSIKX is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

0.65

The correlation between HRSMX and GSIKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HRSMX vs. GSIKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HRSMX
HRSMX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
HRSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
HRSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIKX
GSIKX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
GSIKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HRSMX vs. GSIKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hood River Small-Cap Growth Fund (HRSMX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund (GSIKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HRSMXGSIKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.39

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

2.77

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.73

10.10

+1.62

HRSMX vs. GSIKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the GSIKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRSMX and GSIKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HRSMX vs. GSIKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRSMX drawdown since its inception was -64.92%, which is greater than GSIKX's maximum drawdown of -56.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRSMX and GSIKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HRSMXGSIKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.92%

-56.58%

-8.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.78%

-11.28%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.04%

-12.11%

-20.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.49%

-25.90%

-12.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.74%

-34.47%

-6.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.54%

0.00%

-12.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.02%

-11.73%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.93%

3.09%

+0.84%

Volatility

HRSMX vs. GSIKX - Volatility Comparison

Hood River Small-Cap Growth Fund (HRSMX) has a higher volatility of 9.10% compared to Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund (GSIKX) at 3.98%. This indicates that HRSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HRSMXGSIKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.10%

3.98%

+5.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.37%

12.36%

+11.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.85%

14.60%

+14.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.67%

14.71%

+12.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.15%

15.79%

+10.36%

HRSMX vs. GSIKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRSMX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIKX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

HRSMX vs. GSIKX - Dividend Comparison

HRSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than GSIKX's 3.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSIKX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund
3.45%3.93%3.23%2.78%0.64%2.90%1.96%2.85%14.89%1.73%2.35%1.14%
HRSMX
Hood River Small-Cap Growth Fund
3.51%4.23%3.75%0.00%0.00%19.96%6.28%0.00%4.59%6.74%0.00%5.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


HRSMX and GSIKX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HRSMX has higher volatility (9.10%) compared to GSIKX (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRSMX dropped -64.92% vs GSIKX's -56.58%.

GSIKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HRSMX and GSIKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer