PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HRSCX vs. UMBMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HRSCX vs. UMBMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth Fund (HRSCX) and Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRSCX achieves a 18.00% return, which is significantly higher than UMBMX's 12.18% return. Over the past 10 years, HRSCX has underperformed UMBMX with an annualized return of 9.25%, while UMBMX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.73% annualized return.


HRSCX

1D
-0.52%
1M
4.06%
YTD
18.00%
6M
18.33%
1Y
38.23%
3Y*
17.16%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*
9.25%

UMBMX

1D
-0.62%
1M
0.44%
YTD
12.18%
6M
12.91%
1Y
25.67%
3Y*
20.54%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
12.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HRSCX vs. UMBMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HRSCX
Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth Fund
18.00%11.26%12.85%14.06%-27.67%0.80%37.26%25.40%-10.92%22.88%
UMBMX
Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund
12.18%15.46%22.93%12.73%-17.31%15.69%27.28%20.76%-9.83%24.04%

Correlation

The correlation between HRSCX and UMBMX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2006

0.90

The correlation between HRSCX and UMBMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HRSCX vs. UMBMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRSCX
HRSCX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
HRSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
HRSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

UMBMX
UMBMX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
UMBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
UMBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HRSCX vs. UMBMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth Fund (HRSCX) and Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HRSCXUMBMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.97

1.82

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.73

2.61

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.32

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

2.82

+0.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.18

11.19

+1.99

HRSCX vs. UMBMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the UMBMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRSCX and UMBMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HRSCXUMBMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

1.82

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.50

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.67

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.58

-0.16

Drawdowns

HRSCX vs. UMBMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRSCX drawdown since its inception was -55.68%, which is greater than UMBMX's maximum drawdown of -49.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRSCX and UMBMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HRSCXUMBMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.68%

-49.91%

-5.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.15%

-9.19%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.37%

-19.41%

-8.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.22%

-26.30%

-11.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.32%

-36.91%

-1.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-1.48%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.50%

-7.11%

-4.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

2.32%

+0.61%

Volatility

HRSCX vs. UMBMX - Volatility Comparison

Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth Fund (HRSCX) has a higher volatility of 5.85% compared to Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX) at 4.14%. This indicates that HRSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMBMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HRSCXUMBMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

4.14%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.36%

11.24%

+4.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.77%

14.36%

+5.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.61%

17.72%

+5.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.97%

19.11%

+4.86%

HRSCX vs. UMBMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRSCX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBMX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

HRSCX vs. UMBMX - Dividend Comparison

HRSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.14%, less than UMBMX's 9.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HRSCX
Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth Fund
7.14%8.42%22.56%9.37%38.95%40.00%18.51%6.62%26.17%8.10%0.06%7.03%
UMBMX
Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund
9.18%10.29%15.75%0.17%4.21%11.54%2.40%0.74%8.09%8.38%2.39%8.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


HRSCX and UMBMX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HRSCX has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to UMBMX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRSCX dropped -55.68% vs UMBMX's -49.91%.

HRSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HRSCX and UMBMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer