HRL vs. PG
HRL (Hormel Foods Corporation) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — HRL in Packaged Foods, PG in Household & Personal Products. Over the past 10 years, HRL returned -1.18%/yr vs 8.14%/yr for PG. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
HRL vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HRL achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 3.07% return. Over the past 10 years, HRL has underperformed PG with an annualized return of -1.18%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.14% annualized return.
HRL
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 4.30%
- YTD
- 9.69%
- 1Y
- -6.30%
- 3Y*
- -11.32%
- 5Y*
- -8.56%
- 10Y*
- -1.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.31%
PG
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- 6M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- 3.07%
- 1Y
- -1.15%
- 3Y*
- 0.02%
- 5Y*
- 2.93%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $92.12M | $94.55M | $119.06M | |
| $1.25B | $1.28B | $1.30B |
HRL vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRL Hormel Foods Corporation | 9.69% | -21.27% | 1.21% | -27.49% | -4.67% | 6.99% | 5.38% | 7.85% | 19.68% | 6.72% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 3.07% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between HRL and PG is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1990 | 0.30 |
The correlation between HRL and PG shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HRL:
$13.76B
PG:
$336.46B
HRL:
$0.85
PG:
$6.62
HRL:
29.50
PG:
21.84
HRL:
1.13
PG:
4.03
HRL:
1.27
PG:
6.44
HRL:
$12.22B
PG:
$87.03B
HRL:
$1.92B
PG:
$43.67B
HRL:
$868.07M
PG:
$21.25B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HRL vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
HRL
PG
HRL vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HRL | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.01 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | -0.07 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.36 | -0.13 | -0.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HRL vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HRL drawdown since its inception was -58.46%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRL and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HRL | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.46% | -54.25% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.82% | -15.52% | -14.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.94% | -21.15% | -25.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.46% | -23.77% | -34.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.46% | -23.77% | -34.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.75% | -15.63% | -31.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.00% | -12.17% | +0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.70% | 9.06% | +8.64% |
Volatility
HRL vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) have volatilities of 6.95% and 6.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HRL | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.95% | 6.95% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.46% | 15.72% | +5.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.32% | 19.64% | +10.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.45% | 18.08% | +6.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.45% | 19.18% | +4.27% |
Dividends
HRL vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
HRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than PG's 2.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRL Hormel Foods Corporation | 4.67% | 4.89% | 3.60% | 3.43% | 2.28% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 1.86% | 1.76% | 1.87% | 1.67% | 1.26% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.97% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Financials
HRL vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hormel Foods Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HRL vs. PG - Profitability Comparison
HRL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hormel Foods Corporation reported a gross profit of 518.51M and revenue of 2.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.4%.
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.28B and revenue of 21.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.5%.
HRL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hormel Foods Corporation reported an operating income of 217.11M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 3.95B and revenue of 21.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.
HRL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hormel Foods Corporation reported a net income of 157.50M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 3.00B and revenue of 21.20B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HRL and PG have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PG has higher volatility (6.95%) compared to HRL (6.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRL dropped -58.46% vs PG's -54.25%.
PG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.06 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HRL and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer