PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HRAAX vs. GRSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HRAAX vs. GRSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Growth Allocation Fund (HRAAX) and Greenspring Fund (GRSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRAAX achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly lower than GRSPX's 21.22% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HRAAX having a 9.89% annualized return and GRSPX not far ahead at 10.30%.


HRAAX

1D
-0.71%
1M
2.99%
YTD
9.04%
6M
9.38%
1Y
21.84%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*
9.89%

GRSPX

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.75%
YTD
21.22%
6M
19.08%
1Y
27.02%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
10.46%
10Y*
10.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HRAAX vs. GRSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HRAAX
Hartford Growth Allocation Fund
9.04%17.15%17.00%14.99%-16.26%13.52%13.08%22.02%-7.40%18.48%
GRSPX
Greenspring Fund
21.22%6.12%16.03%11.95%-8.62%26.89%3.81%20.84%-10.21%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between HRAAX and GRSPX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2004

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between HRAAX and GRSPX has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HRAAX vs. GRSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRAAX
HRAAX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
HRAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
HRAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

GRSPX
GRSPX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
GRSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
GRSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HRAAX vs. GRSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Growth Allocation Fund (HRAAX) and Greenspring Fund (GRSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HRAAXGRSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.34

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

3.75

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.77

12.05

+0.73

HRAAX vs. GRSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the GRSPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRAAX and GRSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HRAAXGRSPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

1.92

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.69

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.68

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.70

-0.20

Drawdowns

HRAAX vs. GRSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRAAX drawdown since its inception was -48.94%, which is greater than GRSPX's maximum drawdown of -35.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRAAX and GRSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HRAAXGRSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.94%

-35.67%

-13.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.90%

-7.97%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.07%

-19.33%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.64%

-19.33%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.42%

-35.07%

+4.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-0.30%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.63%

-4.81%

-1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

2.39%

-0.64%

Volatility

HRAAX vs. GRSPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Growth Allocation Fund (HRAAX) is 3.04%, while Greenspring Fund (GRSPX) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that HRAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HRAAXGRSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

5.51%

-2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

11.73%

-3.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.29%

15.59%

-5.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.94%

15.57%

-2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.83%

15.35%

-1.52%

HRAAX vs. GRSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRAAX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than GRSPX's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

HRAAX vs. GRSPX - Dividend Comparison

HRAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.92%, more than GRSPX's 7.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRSPX
Greenspring Fund
7.76%9.40%7.14%6.84%8.04%7.69%2.39%7.89%11.05%9.63%6.81%5.34%
HRAAX
Hartford Growth Allocation Fund
9.92%10.81%4.68%1.56%6.56%7.71%4.06%4.36%3.88%2.37%0.43%7.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


HRAAX and GRSPX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRSPX has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to HRAAX (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRAAX dropped -48.94% vs GRSPX's -35.67%.

HRAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HRAAX and GRSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer