HRAAX vs. ACV

Last updated Jun 17, 2026

HRAAX (Hartford Growth Allocation Fund) and ACV (Virtus Diversified Income & Convertible Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, HRAAX returned 10.15%/yr vs 17.06%/yr for ACV. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HRAAX charges 0.53%/yr vs 2.69%/yr for ACV.

Performance

HRAAX vs. ACV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Growth Allocation Fund (HRAAX) and Virtus Diversified Income & Convertible Fund (ACV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRAAX achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly lower than ACV's 11.06% return. Over the past 10 years, HRAAX has underperformed ACV with an annualized return of 10.15%, while ACV has yielded a comparatively higher 17.06% annualized return.

HRAAX

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: 2.91%
• YTD: 9.56%
• 6M: 10.35%
• 1Y: 21.71%
• 3Y*: 16.73%
• 5Y*: 8.42%
• 10Y*: 10.15%

ACV

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 4.88%
• YTD: 11.06%
• 6M: 15.40%
• 1Y: 41.09%
• 3Y*: 24.41%
• 5Y*: 10.32%
• 10Y*: 17.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HRAAX vs. ACV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HRAAX Hartford Growth Allocation Fund	9.56%	17.15%	17.00%	14.99%	-16.26%	13.52%	13.08%	22.02%	-7.40%	18.48%
ACV Virtus Diversified Income & Convertible Fund	11.06%	33.70%	15.39%	25.96%	-35.98%	24.45%	45.80%	44.15%	-7.01%	27.95%

Correlation

The correlation between HRAAX and ACV is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2015	0.61

The correlation between HRAAX and ACV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HRAAX vs. ACV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRAAX

HRAAX Risk / Return Rank: 65
HRAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
HRAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
HRAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
HRAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
HRAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

ACV

ACV Risk / Return Rank: 70
ACV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
ACV Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
ACV Omega Ratio Rank: 75
ACV Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
ACV Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HRAAX vs. ACV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Growth Allocation Fund (HRAAX) and Virtus Diversified Income & Convertible Fund (ACV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HRAAX	ACV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	2.39	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	3.05	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.43	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	2.79	+0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.60	10.69	+1.91

HRAAX vs. ACV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the ACV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRAAX and ACV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HRAAX vs. ACV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRAAX drawdown since its inception was -48.94%, smaller than the maximum ACV drawdown of -53.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRAAX and ACV.

Drawdown Indicators

	HRAAX	ACV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.94%	-53.64%	+4.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.90%	-14.81%	+6.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.07%	-23.46%	+9.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.64%	-48.80%	+25.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.42%	-53.64%	+23.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-0.86%	+0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.62%	-14.82%	+8.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.78%	3.85%	-2.07%

Volatility

HRAAX vs. ACV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Growth Allocation Fund (HRAAX) is 4.38%, while Virtus Diversified Income & Convertible Fund (ACV) has a volatility of 8.12%. This indicates that HRAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HRAAX	ACV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.38%	8.12%	-3.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.89%	14.85%	-5.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.85%	17.25%	-6.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.03%	23.64%	-10.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.86%	25.87%	-12.01%

HRAAX vs. ACV - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRAAX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than ACV's 2.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

HRAAX vs. ACV - Dividend Comparison

HRAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.87%, more than ACV's 9.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACV Virtus Diversified Income & Convertible Fund	9.07%	9.68%	9.84%	10.30%	12.69%	24.19%	7.28%	8.15%	10.76%	9.18%	10.67%	5.52%
HRAAX Hartford Growth Allocation Fund	9.87%	10.81%	4.68%	1.56%	6.56%	7.71%	4.06%	4.36%	3.88%	2.37%	0.43%	7.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HRAAX and ACV in my portfolio?

HRAAX and ACV have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HRAAX or ACV?

ACV has higher volatility (8.12%) compared to HRAAX (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRAAX dropped -48.94% vs ACV's -53.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.