HQU.TO vs. QQQX.TO
HQU.TO (BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF) and QQQX.TO (Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds from Global X. Over the past year, HQU.TO returned 81.34% vs 43.61% for QQQX.TO. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
HQU.TO vs. QQQX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HQU.TO achieves a 41.30% return, which is significantly higher than QQQX.TO's 22.91% return.
HQU.TO
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- 22.05%
- YTD
- 41.30%
- 6M
- 36.32%
- 1Y
- 81.34%
- 3Y*
- 46.99%
- 5Y*
- 23.89%
- 10Y*
- 33.31%
QQQX.TO
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 13.05%
- YTD
- 22.91%
- 6M
- 19.10%
- 1Y
- 43.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HQU.TO vs. QQQX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HQU.TO BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF | 41.30% | 26.77% | 20.06% |
QQQX.TO Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF | 22.91% | 14.55% | 20.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between HQU.TO and QQQX.TO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2024 | 0.90 |
The correlation between HQU.TO and QQQX.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HQU.TO vs. QQQX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HQU.TO
QQQX.TO
HQU.TO vs. QQQX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) and Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HQU.TO | QQQX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.66 | 2.74 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.15 | 3.63 | -0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.48 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 3.60 | -0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.20 | 11.56 | -0.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HQU.TO | QQQX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 2.74 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 1.44 | -1.38 |
Drawdowns
HQU.TO vs. QQQX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HQU.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.76%, which is greater than QQQX.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HQU.TO and QQQX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HQU.TO | QQQX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.76% | -22.62% | -73.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.85% | -12.18% | -13.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.29% | -3.96% | -51.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.54% | 3.78% | +3.76% |
Volatility
HQU.TO vs. QQQX.TO - Volatility Comparison
BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.22% compared to Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQX.TO) at 4.73%. This indicates that HQU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HQU.TO | QQQX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.22% | 4.73% | +4.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.33% | 11.94% | +12.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.85% | 16.02% | +15.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.90% | 20.74% | +24.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.87% | 20.74% | +24.13% |
Dividends
HQU.TO vs. QQQX.TO - Dividend Comparison
HQU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HQU.TO BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQX.TO Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF | 0.29% | 0.35% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, HQU.TO and QQQX.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for HQU.TO and QQQX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer