PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HQU.TO vs. ANXU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HQU.TO vs. ANXU.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HQU.TO (BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF) and ANXU.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. Over the past 10 years, HQU.TO returned 33.31%/yr vs 22.74%/yr for ANXU.L. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HQU.TO vs. ANXU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HQU.TO is traded in CAD, while ANXU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ANXU.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HQU.TO achieves a 41.30% return, which is significantly higher than ANXU.L's 22.04% return. Over the past 10 years, HQU.TO has outperformed ANXU.L with an annualized return of 33.31%, while ANXU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 22.74% annualized return.

HQU.TO

1D
0.95%
1M
22.05%
YTD
41.30%
6M
36.32%
1Y
81.34%
3Y*
46.99%
5Y*
23.89%
10Y*
33.31%

ANXU.L

1D
0.34%
1M
12.92%
YTD
22.04%
6M
19.52%
1Y
43.86%
3Y*
30.21%
5Y*
21.32%
10Y*
22.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HQU.TO vs. ANXU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HQU.TO
BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF		41.30%26.77%40.01%114.00%-61.73%52.20%83.84%80.24%-11.03%68.57%
ANXU.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD		22.04%14.36%37.62%53.05%-28.48%26.71%43.44%35.17%6.60%23.06%

Correlation

The correlation between HQU.TO and ANXU.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2011

0.37

Over the past year, HQU.TO and ANXU.L have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.

HQU.TO vs. ANXU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
HQU.TO
ANXU.L

Technology

52.7%
53.7%

Communication Services

15.2%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

14.3%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
7.7%

Healthcare

5.0%
4.2%

Industrials

3.5%
3.1%

Basic Materials

1.3%
1.1%

Utilities

1.2%
1.4%

Energy

0.6%
0.6%

Financial Services

0.5%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.2%
0.1%

Technology

HQU.TO
52.7%
ANXU.L
53.7%

Communication Services

HQU.TO
15.2%
ANXU.L
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

HQU.TO
14.3%
ANXU.L
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

HQU.TO
5.5%
ANXU.L
7.7%

Healthcare

HQU.TO
5.0%
ANXU.L
4.2%

Industrials

HQU.TO
3.5%
ANXU.L
3.1%

Basic Materials

HQU.TO
1.3%
ANXU.L
1.1%

Utilities

HQU.TO
1.2%
ANXU.L
1.4%

Energy

HQU.TO
0.6%
ANXU.L
0.6%

Financial Services

HQU.TO
0.5%
ANXU.L
0.2%

Real Estate

HQU.TO
0.2%
ANXU.L
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF

Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD

Often compared with HQU.TO:
HQU.TO vs. LYMZ.DEHQU.TO vs. PQAPHQU.TO vs. IFEDHQU.TO vs. LYY8.DEHQU.TO vs. HXQ.TOHQU.TO vs. QBUFHQU.TO vs. BRKW
Often compared with ANXU.L:
ANXU.L vs. CNDX.ASANXU.L vs. EQQQ.DEANXU.L vs. QQQMANXU.L vs. QQQANXU.L vs. RACE.MIANXU.L vs. 10AJ.DEANXU.L vs. DAPP.L

Return for Risk

HQU.TO vs. ANXU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HQU.TO
HQU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HQU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HQU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
ANXU.L
ANXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HQU.TO vs. ANXU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HQU.TOANXU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.66
2.71

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.15
3.66

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.47

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

3.86

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.20

11.49

-0.29

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HQU.TO vs. ANXU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HQU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HQU.TO and ANXU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HQU.TOANXU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

2.71

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

1.07

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

1.27

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

1.44

-1.38

Drawdowns

HQU.TO vs. ANXU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HQU.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.76%, which is greater than ANXU.L's maximum drawdown of -31.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HQU.TO and ANXU.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HQU.TOANXU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.76%

-31.17%

-64.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.85%

-11.30%

-14.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.00%

-23.54%

-19.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.83%

-31.17%

-33.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.83%

-31.17%

-33.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.29%

-5.39%

-49.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.54%

3.81%

+3.73%

Volatility

HQU.TO vs. ANXU.L - Volatility Comparison

BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (HQU.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.22% compared to Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) at 5.01%. This indicates that HQU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANXU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HQU.TOANXU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.22%

5.01%

+4.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.33%

11.84%

+12.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.85%

16.15%

+15.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.90%

20.07%

+24.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.87%

20.51%

+24.36%

Dividends

HQU.TO vs. ANXU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HQU.TO nor ANXU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

HQU.TO and ANXU.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Amundi.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HQU.TO and ANXU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer