PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HPYM.TO vs. USCL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HPYM.TO vs. USCL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO) and Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HPYM.TO achieves a -1.25% return, which is significantly lower than USCL.TO's 11.57% return.


HPYM.TO

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
-1.25%
6M
-1.71%
1Y
2.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USCL.TO

1D
-0.08%
1M
7.59%
YTD
11.57%
6M
9.93%
1Y
29.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HPYM.TO vs. USCL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HPYM.TO and USCL.TO is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2024

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HPYM.TO vs. USCL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HPYM.TO
HPYM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
HPYM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPYM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPYM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
HPYM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPYM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

USCL.TO
USCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
USCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HPYM.TO vs. USCL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO) and Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HPYM.TOUSCL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.49

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

3.51

-2.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.05

14.29

-12.25

HPYM.TO vs. USCL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HPYM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the USCL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HPYM.TO and USCL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HPYM.TOUSCL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

2.55

-1.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

1.42

-1.05

Drawdowns

HPYM.TO vs. USCL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HPYM.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.19%, smaller than the maximum USCL.TO drawdown of -21.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPYM.TO and USCL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HPYM.TOUSCL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-21.85%

+15.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.85%

-8.56%

+4.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

-0.08%

-2.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.94%

-2.55%

+0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.36%

2.10%

-0.74%

Volatility

HPYM.TO vs. USCL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO) is 2.02%, while Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that HPYM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USCL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HPYM.TOUSCL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

2.86%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.28%

9.31%

-6.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.53%

11.79%

-7.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.61%

15.44%

-9.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.61%

15.44%

-9.83%

HPYM.TO vs. USCL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HPYM.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than USCL.TO's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

HPYM.TO vs. USCL.TO - Dividend Comparison

HPYM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.38%, less than USCL.TO's 11.95% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
HPYM.TO
Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units
9.38%9.01%8.07%0.00%
USCL.TO
Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
11.95%12.94%11.57%7.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


HPYM.TO and USCL.TO have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USCL.TO is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USCL.TO is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for HPYM.TO.

HPYM.TO is categorized as Government Bonds, while USCL.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for HPYM.TO and 0.04% for USCL.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HPYM.TO and USCL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer