PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HPYM.TO vs. LLHE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HPYM.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO) and Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (LLHE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HPYM.TO achieves a -1.75% return, which is significantly lower than LLHE.TO's 18.08% return.


HPYM.TO

1D
0.20%
1M
-1.09%
6M
-1.47%
YTD
-1.75%
1Y
1.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.70%

LLHE.TO

1D
1.25%
1M
7.43%
6M
19.27%
YTD
18.08%
1Y
55.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$195.19KCA$184.36KCA$228.35K
CA$534.69KCA$637.71KCA$684.39K

HPYM.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HPYM.TO and LLHE.TO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HPYM.TO vs. LLHE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HPYM.TO
HPYM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
HPYM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPYM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPYM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
HPYM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPYM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

LLHE.TO
LLHE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
LLHE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLHE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLHE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
LLHE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLHE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HPYM.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO) and Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (LLHE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HPYM.TOLLHE.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.27

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

2.21

-1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.83

5.64

-4.81

HPYM.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HPYM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the LLHE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HPYM.TO and LLHE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HPYM.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HPYM.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.19%, smaller than the maximum LLHE.TO drawdown of -37.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPYM.TO and LLHE.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HPYM.TOLLHE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-37.80%

+31.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.87%

-25.14%

+21.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.22%

-2.94%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.97%

-12.86%

+10.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

9.81%

-8.14%

Volatility

HPYM.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO) is 1.59%, while Harvest Eli Lilly Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (LLHE.TO) has a volatility of 9.46%. This indicates that HPYM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LLHE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HPYM.TOLLHE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.59%

9.46%

-7.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.78%

28.53%

-24.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.72%

40.59%

-35.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.62%

40.91%

-35.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.62%

40.91%

-35.29%

HPYM.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HPYM.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LLHE.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

HPYM.TO vs. LLHE.TO - Dividend Comparison

HPYM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.39%, less than LLHE.TO's 18.91% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


HPYM.TO and LLHE.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LLHE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LLHE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for HPYM.TO.

HPYM.TO is categorized as Government Bonds, while LLHE.TO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for HPYM.TO and 0.40% for LLHE.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HPYM.TO and LLHE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer