PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HPYM.TO vs. HUTE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HPYM.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HPYM.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HPYM.TO achieves a -0.72% return, which is significantly lower than HUTE.TO's 13.43% return.


HPYM.TO

1D
-0.24%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
-0.72%
6M
-0.09%
1Y
2.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HUTE.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
13.43%
6M
14.88%
1Y
21.85%
3Y*
15.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HPYM.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HPYM.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than HUTE.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HPYM.TO vs. HUTE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HPYM.TO
HPYM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
HPYM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPYM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPYM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
HPYM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPYM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

HUTE.TO
HUTE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
HUTE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUTE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUTE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
HUTE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUTE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HPYM.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HPYM.TOHUTE.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.53

1.58

-1.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.78

2.08

-1.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.32

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

2.48

-1.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.57

9.81

-7.24

HPYM.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HPYM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the HUTE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HPYM.TO and HUTE.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HPYM.TOHUTE.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

1.58

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

1.19

-0.75

Correlation

The correlation between HPYM.TO and HUTE.TO is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

HPYM.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Dividend Comparison

HPYM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.29%, more than HUTE.TO's 8.87% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
HPYM.TO
Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units
9.29%9.01%8.07%0.00%0.00%
HUTE.TO
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF
8.87%9.64%10.24%10.70%1.61%

Drawdowns

HPYM.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HPYM.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.19%, smaller than the maximum HUTE.TO drawdown of -18.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPYM.TO and HUTE.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HPYM.TOHUTE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-18.36%

+12.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.89%

-8.95%

+6.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

-1.81%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-3.94%

+2.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

2.29%

-1.18%

Volatility

HPYM.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO) is 1.81%, while Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO) has a volatility of 4.22%. This indicates that HPYM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUTE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HPYM.TOHUTE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.81%

4.22%

-2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.14%

7.78%

-4.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.78%

13.90%

-9.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.64%

14.24%

-8.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.64%

14.24%

-8.60%