HPRD.L vs. XREP.L
HPRD.L (HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF) and XREP.L (Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP) are both REIT funds - HPRD.L tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD while XREP.L tracks the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Real Estate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HPRD.L returned 9.23%/yr vs 9.48%/yr for XREP.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HPRD.L charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XREP.L.
Performance
HPRD.L vs. XREP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HPRD.L is traded in USD, while XREP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XREP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HPRD.L achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly lower than XREP.L's 9.03% return.
HPRD.L
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- 6.60%
- 6M
- 7.06%
- 1Y
- 11.93%
- 3Y*
- 9.23%
- 5Y*
- 1.18%
- 10Y*
- 3.52%
XREP.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 9.03%
- 6M
- 9.04%
- 1Y
- 9.34%
- 3Y*
- 9.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HPRD.L vs. XREP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPRD.L HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF | 6.60% | 10.90% | -0.19% | 10.88% | 8.07% |
XREP.L Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP | 9.03% | 4.22% | 2.34% | 12.23% | 7.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between HPRD.L and XREP.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2022 | 0.86 |
The correlation between HPRD.L and XREP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
HPRD.L vs. XREP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HPRD.L
XREP.L
Real Estate
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
HPRD.L
XREP.L
Technology
HPRD.L
XREP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
HPRD.L
XREP.L
-
Financial Services
HPRD.L
XREP.L
-
Basic Materials
HPRD.L
-
XREP.L
-
Communication Services
HPRD.L
-
XREP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
HPRD.L
-
XREP.L
-
Energy
HPRD.L
-
XREP.L
-
Healthcare
HPRD.L
-
XREP.L
-
Industrials
HPRD.L
-
XREP.L
-
Utilities
HPRD.L
-
XREP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HPRD.L vs. XREP.L — Risk / Return Rank
HPRD.L
XREP.L
HPRD.L vs. XREP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRD.L) and Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP (XREP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HPRD.L | XREP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.18 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 0.32 | +0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.33 | 0.48 | +3.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HPRD.L | XREP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 0.21 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.35 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
HPRD.L vs. XREP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HPRD.L drawdown since its inception was -41.81%, which is greater than XREP.L's maximum drawdown of -28.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPRD.L and XREP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HPRD.L | XREP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.81% | -28.63% | -13.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.12% | -28.63% | +18.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.25% | -28.63% | +10.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.76% | -20.87% | +17.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | -9.73% | +0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 19.33% | -16.58% |
Volatility
HPRD.L vs. XREP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRD.L) is 3.69%, while Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP (XREP.L) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that HPRD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XREP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HPRD.L | XREP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 4.27% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.30% | 9.75% | -0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.99% | 44.18% | -32.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.32% | 28.34% | -12.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 28.34% | -11.41% |
HPRD.L vs. XREP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HPRD.L has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than XREP.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HPRD.L vs. XREP.L - Dividend Comparison
HPRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, while XREP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPRD.L HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF | 3.06% | 3.17% | 3.39% | 3.35% | 3.53% | 2.30% | 2.88% | 2.96% | 3.43% | 2.89% | 3.13% | 2.72% |
XREP.L Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HPRD.L and XREP.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XREP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XREP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for HPRD.L.
HPRD.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while XREP.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Real Estate Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for HPRD.L and 0.14% for XREP.L.
Find the right allocation for HPRD.L and XREP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer