HPR.TO vs. XDIV.TO
HPR.TO (Global X Active Preferred Share ETF) and XDIV.TO (iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HPR.TO is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Global X, while XDIV.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. HPR.TO is actively managed, while XDIV.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HPR.TO returned 7.36%/yr vs 16.42%/yr for XDIV.TO. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HPR.TO charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for XDIV.TO.
Performance
HPR.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HPR.TO achieves a 4.70% return, which is significantly lower than XDIV.TO's 19.17% return.
HPR.TO
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 4.70%
- 6M
- 5.83%
- 1Y
- 17.66%
- 3Y*
- 19.60%
- 5Y*
- 7.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.81%
XDIV.TO
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 19.17%
- 6M
- 18.94%
- 1Y
- 38.61%
- 3Y*
- 22.97%
- 5Y*
- 16.42%
- 10Y*
- —
HPR.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPR.TO Global X Active Preferred Share ETF | 4.70% | 17.78% | 27.79% | 8.31% | -19.54% | 24.30% | 6.35% | 2.43% | -10.17% | 6.48% |
XDIV.TO iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF | 19.17% | 24.92% | 19.56% | 11.71% | 0.29% | 32.25% | -7.81% | 24.84% | -10.04% | 8.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between HPR.TO and XDIV.TO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HPR.TO and XDIV.TO has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
HPR.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HPR.TO
XDIV.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
HPR.TO
XDIV.TO
Basic Materials
HPR.TO
-
XDIV.TO
-
Communication Services
HPR.TO
-
XDIV.TO
Consumer Cyclical
HPR.TO
-
XDIV.TO
Consumer Defensive
HPR.TO
-
XDIV.TO
-
Energy
HPR.TO
-
XDIV.TO
Healthcare
HPR.TO
-
XDIV.TO
-
Industrials
HPR.TO
-
XDIV.TO
-
Real Estate
HPR.TO
-
XDIV.TO
-
Technology
HPR.TO
-
XDIV.TO
Utilities
HPR.TO
-
XDIV.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HPR.TO vs. XDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HPR.TO
XDIV.TO
HPR.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Active Preferred Share ETF (HPR.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HPR.TO | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.95 | 2.03 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.98 | 16.64 | -8.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 41.59 | 56.55 | -14.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HPR.TO | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.26 | 4.94 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 1.57 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.81 | -0.81 |
Drawdowns
HPR.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HPR.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.01%, which is greater than XDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -41.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPR.TO and XDIV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HPR.TO | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.01% | -41.30% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.22% | -2.33% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.83% | -10.53% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.88% | -17.60% | -5.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -0.09% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -4.25% | -1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.43% | 0.69% | -0.26% |
Volatility
HPR.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Active Preferred Share ETF (HPR.TO) is 0.98%, while iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that HPR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HPR.TO | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.98% | 2.81% | -1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.68% | 6.36% | -3.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.17% | 7.85% | -3.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.43% | 10.53% | -2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.80% | 16.01% | -4.21% |
HPR.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HPR.TO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than XDIV.TO's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
HPR.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison
HPR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than XDIV.TO's 3.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPR.TO Global X Active Preferred Share ETF | 4.73% | 4.34% | 4.28% | 5.56% | 5.96% | 4.01% | 5.12% | 4.88% | 4.40% | 3.89% | 4.34% | 4.61% |
XDIV.TO iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF | 3.28% | 3.81% | 4.29% | 4.20% | 3.95% | 3.58% | 4.58% | 4.02% | 4.85% | 1.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HPR.TO and XDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for HPR.TO.
HPR.TO is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while XDIV.TO is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for HPR.TO and 0.11% for XDIV.TO.
Find the right allocation for HPR.TO and XDIV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer