PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HPJP.L vs. CNKY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HPJP.L vs. CNKY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPJP.L) and iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HPJP.L is traded in USD, while CNKY.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CNKY.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HPJP.L achieves a 7.76% return, which is significantly lower than CNKY.L's 30.57% return.


HPJP.L

1D
-1.56%
1M
-1.56%
6M
2.77%
YTD
7.76%
1Y
24.60%
3Y*
9.93%
5Y*
10Y*

CNKY.L

1D
-0.72%
1M
-3.34%
6M
22.94%
YTD
30.57%
1Y
58.52%
3Y*
22.74%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
11.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HPJP.L vs. CNKY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HPJP.L
HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF
7.76%23.28%-3.07%16.34%-24.08%-1.77%
CNKY.L
iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc)
30.57%29.74%7.33%21.09%-20.09%-3.24%

Correlation

The correlation between HPJP.L and CNKY.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021

0.88

The correlation between HPJP.L and CNKY.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HPJP.L vs. CNKY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HPJP.L
HPJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
HPJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
HPJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

CNKY.L
CNKY.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
CNKY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNKY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNKY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
CNKY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNKY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HPJP.L vs. CNKY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPJP.L) and iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HPJP.LCNKY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.35

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

3.81

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.75

11.92

-6.17

HPJP.L vs. CNKY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HPJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the CNKY.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HPJP.L and CNKY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HPJP.L vs. CNKY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HPJP.L drawdown since its inception was -33.79%, smaller than the maximum CNKY.L drawdown of -99.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPJP.L and CNKY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HPJP.LCNKY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.79%

-99.39%

+65.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.95%

-15.28%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.10%

-19.43%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.69%

-97.11%

+92.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.31%

-95.37%

+80.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.27%

4.89%

-0.62%

Volatility

HPJP.L vs. CNKY.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPJP.L) is 7.80%, while iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L) has a volatility of 9.89%. This indicates that HPJP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNKY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HPJP.LCNKY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.80%

9.89%

-2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.56%

22.01%

-3.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.49%

26.83%

-4.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.74%

20.56%

+4.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.74%

18.73%

+6.01%

HPJP.L vs. CNKY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HPJP.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CNKY.L's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

HPJP.L vs. CNKY.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HPJP.L nor CNKY.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, HPJP.L and CNKY.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, HPJP.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HPJP.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for CNKY.L.

HPJP.L tracks HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF, while CNKY.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for HPJP.L and 0.48% for CNKY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HPJP.L and CNKY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer