HPAS.L vs. MXUS.L
HPAS.L (HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc) and MXUS.L (Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from HSBC and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HPAS.L returned 17.97%/yr vs 19.55%/yr for MXUS.L. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HPAS.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MXUS.L.
Performance
HPAS.L vs. MXUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HPAS.L is traded in GBP, while MXUS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MXUS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HPAS.L having a 10.62% return and MXUS.L slightly higher at 10.70%.
HPAS.L
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 9.13%
- YTD
- 10.62%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- 27.36%
- 3Y*
- 17.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MXUS.L
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 10.70%
- 6M
- 10.57%
- 1Y
- 28.92%
- 3Y*
- 19.55%
- 5Y*
- 14.79%
- 10Y*
- 16.34%
HPAS.L vs. MXUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPAS.L HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.62% | 5.65% | 26.90% | 22.43% | -14.66% | 11.67% |
MXUS.L Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 10.70% | 8.98% | 27.76% | 21.45% | -10.52% | 10.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between HPAS.L and MXUS.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2021 | 0.91 |
The correlation between HPAS.L and MXUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HPAS.L vs. MXUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
HPAS.L
MXUS.L
HPAS.L vs. MXUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc (HPAS.L) and Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HPAS.L | MXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.45 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | 3.79 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.24 | 12.44 | -6.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HPAS.L | MXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 2.41 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 1.02 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
HPAS.L vs. MXUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HPAS.L drawdown since its inception was -23.23%, smaller than the maximum MXUS.L drawdown of -26.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPAS.L and MXUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HPAS.L | MXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.23% | -26.52% | +3.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.57% | -7.59% | -4.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.23% | -21.41% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.21% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.00% | -3.30% | -2.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 2.32% | +2.06% |
Volatility
HPAS.L vs. MXUS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc (HPAS.L) is 3.25%, while Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (MXUS.L) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that HPAS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HPAS.L | MXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.25% | 3.54% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.55% | 8.64% | -0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 11.99% | +0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 15.66% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 16.67% | -0.94% |
HPAS.L vs. MXUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HPAS.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than MXUS.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HPAS.L vs. MXUS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither HPAS.L nor MXUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HPAS.L and MXUS.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MXUS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MXUS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for HPAS.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for HPAS.L and 0.05% for MXUS.L.
Find the right allocation for HPAS.L and MXUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer