HPAS.L vs. BBSU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc (HPAS.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L).
HPAS.L and BBSU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HPAS.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Aug 3, 2021. BBSU.L is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Apr 3, 2019. Both HPAS.L and BBSU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
HPAS.L vs. BBSU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HPAS.L vs. BBSU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPAS.L HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc | -6.96% | 5.65% | 26.90% | 22.43% | -14.66% | 11.67% |
BBSU.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) | -3.45% | 9.39% | 27.19% | 20.71% | -10.46% | 11.14% |
Different Trading Currencies
HPAS.L is traded in GBP, while BBSU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BBSU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HPAS.L achieves a -6.96% return, which is significantly lower than BBSU.L's -3.45% return.
HPAS.L
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -2.28%
- YTD
- -6.96%
- 6M
- -4.22%
- 1Y
- 10.20%
- 3Y*
- 13.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBSU.L
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- YTD
- -3.45%
- 6M
- -0.34%
- 1Y
- 14.51%
- 3Y*
- 15.81%
- 5Y*
- 12.13%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HPAS.L vs. BBSU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HPAS.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than BBSU.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
HPAS.L vs. BBSU.L — Risk / Return Rank
HPAS.L
BBSU.L
HPAS.L vs. BBSU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc (HPAS.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HPAS.L | BBSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | 0.94 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.95 | 1.37 | -0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.20 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | 1.84 | -1.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.42 | 6.20 | -3.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HPAS.L | BBSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 0.94 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.84 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between HPAS.L and BBSU.L is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HPAS.L vs. BBSU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither HPAS.L nor BBSU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
HPAS.L vs. BBSU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HPAS.L drawdown since its inception was -23.23%, smaller than the maximum BBSU.L drawdown of -25.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPAS.L and BBSU.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HPAS.L | BBSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.23% | -25.80% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.57% | -10.79% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.58% | -5.43% | -4.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.12% | -3.79% | -2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.21% | 2.32% | +1.89% |
Volatility
HPAS.L vs. BBSU.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc (HPAS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) at 3.78%. This indicates that HPAS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBSU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HPAS.L | BBSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 3.78% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.35% | 8.36% | +0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.59% | 15.46% | +1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.83% | 14.52% | +1.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.83% | 16.22% | -0.39% |