HPAS.L vs. FUSA.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HPAS.L (HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc) and FUSA.L (Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - HPAS.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while FUSA.L is a Dividend fund tracking the Fidelity US Quality Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HPAS.L returned 17.97%/yr vs 15.14%/yr for FUSA.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HPAS.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FUSA.L.

Performance

HPAS.L vs. FUSA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc (HPAS.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HPAS.L is traded in GBP, while FUSA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FUSA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HPAS.L achieves a 10.62% return, which is significantly higher than FUSA.L's 8.42% return.

HPAS.L

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 9.13%
• YTD: 10.62%
• 6M: 10.58%
• 1Y: 27.36%
• 3Y*: 17.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FUSA.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 3.97%
• YTD: 8.42%
• 6M: 8.37%
• 1Y: 25.15%
• 3Y*: 15.14%
• 5Y*: 12.95%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HPAS.L vs. FUSA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HPAS.L HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc	10.62%	5.65%	26.90%	22.43%	-14.66%	11.67%
FUSA.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc	8.42%	8.02%	20.04%	12.14%	0.13%	11.55%

Correlation

The correlation between HPAS.L and FUSA.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2021	0.83

The correlation between HPAS.L and FUSA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HPAS.L vs. FUSA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HPAS.L

HPAS.L Risk / Return Rank: 58
HPAS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
HPAS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
HPAS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 69
HPAS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
HPAS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 40

FUSA.L

FUSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 68
FUSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
FUSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FUSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FUSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FUSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HPAS.L vs. FUSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc (HPAS.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HPAS.L	FUSA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.25	2.28	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	3.17	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.42	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.17	4.49	-2.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.24	16.96	-10.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HPAS.L vs. FUSA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HPAS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the FUSA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HPAS.L and FUSA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HPAS.L	FUSA.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.25	2.28	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.90	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	0.84	-0.07

Drawdowns

HPAS.L vs. FUSA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HPAS.L drawdown since its inception was -23.23%, smaller than the maximum FUSA.L drawdown of -27.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPAS.L and FUSA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HPAS.L	FUSA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.23%	-27.94%	+4.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.57%	-5.58%	-6.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.23%	-19.20%	-4.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	0.00%	-0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.00%	-3.35%	-2.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.38%	1.48%	+2.90%

Volatility

HPAS.L vs. FUSA.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc (HPAS.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L) have volatilities of 3.25% and 3.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HPAS.L	FUSA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.25%	3.40%	-0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.55%	7.90%	+0.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.17%	11.07%	+1.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.73%	14.33%	+1.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.73%	16.94%	-1.21%

HPAS.L vs. FUSA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HPAS.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FUSA.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HPAS.L vs. FUSA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HPAS.L nor FUSA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HPAS.L and FUSA.L in my portfolio?

HPAS.L and FUSA.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HPAS.L or FUSA.L?

On fees, HPAS.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HPAS.L or FUSA.L?

HPAS.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FUSA.L.

What is the main difference between HPAS.L and FUSA.L?

HPAS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FUSA.L is Dividend. HPAS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while FUSA.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for HPAS.L and 0.25% for FUSA.L.