HP3A.DE vs. C001.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Ringmetall SE (HP3A.DE) and Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE).
C001.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the DAX®. It was launched on Dec 7, 2023.
Performance
HP3A.DE vs. C001.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HP3A.DE vs. C001.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HP3A.DE Ringmetall SE | -2.17% | -18.40% | 17.31% | -24.00% | -3.06% | 79.66% | -4.03% | -6.38% | -27.19% | 31.87% |
C001.DE Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist | -5.71% | 22.63% | 18.38% | 19.46% | -12.82% | 15.35% | 3.10% | 24.61% | -18.48% | 12.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HP3A.DE achieves a -2.17% return, which is significantly higher than C001.DE's -5.71% return. Over the past 10 years, HP3A.DE has underperformed C001.DE with an annualized return of 7.52%, while C001.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.41% annualized return.
HP3A.DE
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -6.25%
- YTD
- -2.17%
- 6M
- -6.25%
- 1Y
- -19.48%
- 3Y*
- -5.86%
- 5Y*
- 3.01%
- 10Y*
- 7.52%
C001.DE
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -2.89%
- YTD
- -5.71%
- 6M
- -5.36%
- 1Y
- 2.89%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 8.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HP3A.DE vs. C001.DE — Risk / Return Rank
HP3A.DE
C001.DE
HP3A.DE vs. C001.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ringmetall SE (HP3A.DE) and Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HP3A.DE | C001.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | 0.17 | -0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | 0.34 | -1.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.04 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | 0.49 | -1.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.45 | 1.72 | -3.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HP3A.DE | C001.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.59 | 0.17 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.49 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.46 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.34 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between HP3A.DE and C001.DE is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HP3A.DE vs. C001.DE - Dividend Comparison
HP3A.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than C001.DE's 2.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HP3A.DE Ringmetall SE | 3.70% | 3.62% | 2.87% | 3.27% | 2.17% | 1.38% | 2.43% | 2.27% | 2.08% | 1.24% | 1.62% | 3.07% |
C001.DE Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist | 2.14% | 2.02% | 2.17% | 3.04% | 2.72% | 1.91% | 2.36% | 2.52% | 3.10% | 2.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HP3A.DE vs. C001.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HP3A.DE drawdown since its inception was -65.99%, which is greater than C001.DE's maximum drawdown of -41.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HP3A.DE and C001.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HP3A.DE | C001.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.99% | -41.60% | -24.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.03% | -12.32% | -9.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.52% | -26.64% | -20.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.05% | -38.62% | -16.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.03% | -9.05% | -33.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.50% | -8.29% | -13.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.66% | 3.53% | +11.13% |
Volatility
HP3A.DE vs. C001.DE - Volatility Comparison
Ringmetall SE (HP3A.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.37% compared to Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) at 6.66%. This indicates that HP3A.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than C001.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HP3A.DE | C001.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.37% | 6.66% | +4.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.78% | 11.26% | +13.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.37% | 17.43% | +15.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.94% | 16.83% | +22.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.16% | 18.19% | +18.97% |