PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOV vs. UNM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HOV vs. UNM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. (HOV) and Unum Group (UNM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOV achieves a 13.08% return, which is significantly higher than UNM's 9.05% return. Over the past 10 years, HOV has underperformed UNM with an annualized return of 10.27%, while UNM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.49% annualized return.


HOV

1D
-3.97%
1M
9.99%
YTD
13.08%
6M
-17.67%
1Y
20.51%
3Y*
7.75%
5Y*
-0.03%
10Y*
10.27%

UNM

1D
-0.78%
1M
4.08%
YTD
9.05%
6M
14.91%
1Y
4.12%
3Y*
26.28%
5Y*
25.44%
10Y*
12.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOV vs. UNM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HOV
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.
13.08%-27.11%-14.01%269.82%-66.94%287.37%57.45%22.06%-79.59%22.71%
UNM
Unum Group
9.05%8.56%66.31%13.72%73.56%11.87%-16.22%2.63%-45.22%27.19%

Correlation

The correlation between HOV and UNM is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 1992

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HOV:

$711.77M

UNM:

$13.73B

EPS

HOV:

$5.61

UNM:

$4.61

PE Ratio

HOV:

19.65

UNM:

18.10

PS Ratio

HOV:

0.24

UNM:

1.06

PB Ratio

HOV:

1.03

UNM:

1.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

HOV:

$2.92B

UNM:

$13.30B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HOV:

$2.17B

UNM:

$4.51B

EBITDA (TTM)

HOV:

$74.06M

UNM:

$1.24B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOV vs. UNM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOV
HOV Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
HOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOV Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
HOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOV Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

UNM
UNM Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
UNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNM Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
UNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNM Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOV vs. UNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. (HOV) and Unum Group (UNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HOVUNMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.31

0.17

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.93

0.38

+0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.06

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

0.26

+0.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.91

0.56

+0.35

HOV vs. UNM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOV Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is higher than the UNM Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOV and UNM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOVUNMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

0.17

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

0.85

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

0.33

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.23

-0.25

Drawdowns

HOV vs. UNM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOV drawdown since its inception was -99.70%, which is greater than UNM's maximum drawdown of -89.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOV and UNM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOVUNMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.70%

-89.38%

-10.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.73%

-16.04%

-23.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.12%

-17.94%

-45.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.55%

-28.28%

-46.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.52%

-81.06%

-12.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.97%

-1.19%

-92.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.25%

-32.69%

-37.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.51%

7.39%

+15.12%

Volatility

HOV vs. UNM - Volatility Comparison

Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. (HOV) has a higher volatility of 23.69% compared to Unum Group (UNM) at 4.01%. This indicates that HOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOVUNMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.69%

4.01%

+19.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.72%

14.76%

+33.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.74%

24.67%

+41.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.59%

30.21%

+35.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.71%

37.62%

+38.09%

Dividends

HOV vs. UNM - Dividend Comparison

HOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HOV
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UNM
Unum Group
2.20%2.27%2.15%3.07%3.07%4.76%4.97%3.74%3.34%1.57%1.75%2.10%

Financials

HOV vs. UNM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and Unum Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
667.65M
3.36B
(HOV) Total Revenue
(UNM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HOV vs. UNM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and Unum Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
96.5%
40.3%
Portfolio components
HOV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. reported a gross profit of 644.25M and revenue of 667.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.5%.

UNM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Unum Group reported a gross profit of 1.35B and revenue of 3.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.

HOV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. reported an operating income of 587.25M and revenue of 667.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 88.0%.

UNM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Unum Group reported an operating income of 302.70M and revenue of 3.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.

HOV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. reported a net income of -595.00K and revenue of 667.65M, resulting in a net margin of -0.1%.

UNM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Unum Group reported a net income of 232.00M and revenue of 3.36B, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HOV and UNM have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOV has higher volatility (23.69%) compared to UNM (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOV dropped -99.70% vs UNM's -89.38%.

HOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.31 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOV and UNM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer