HOOZ vs. SEF
HOOZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short HOOD ETF) and SEF (ProShares Short Financials) are both Inverse Equities funds - HOOZ tracks the Robinhood Markets, Inc. while SEF tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HOOZ charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SEF.
Performance
HOOZ vs. SEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOOZ achieves a -43.35% return, which is significantly lower than SEF's 3.40% return.
HOOZ
- 1D
- -11.54%
- 1M
- -52.19%
- YTD
- -43.35%
- 6M
- -38.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEF
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -3.97%
- YTD
- 3.40%
- 6M
- 4.97%
- 1Y
- -0.14%
- 3Y*
- -11.79%
- 5Y*
- -6.47%
- 10Y*
- -12.43%
HOOZ vs. SEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOOZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short HOOD ETF | -43.35% | 2.80% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.40% | -1.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOOZ and SEF is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOOZ vs. SEF — Risk / Return Rank
HOOZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SEF
HOOZ vs. SEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short HOOD ETF (HOOZ) and ProShares Short Financials (SEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOOZ | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.01 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.01 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.03 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOOZ vs. SEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOOZ drawdown since its inception was -77.16%, smaller than the maximum SEF drawdown of -96.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOZ and SEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOOZ | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.16% | -96.51% | +19.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -74.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.37% | -96.29% | +22.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.87% | -82.75% | +49.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.81% | — |
Volatility
HOOZ vs. SEF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOOZ | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 145.36% | 14.38% | +130.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 145.36% | 17.96% | +127.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 145.36% | 20.46% | +124.90% |
HOOZ vs. SEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOOZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than SEF's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOOZ vs. SEF - Dividend Comparison
HOOZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOOZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short HOOD ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.25% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOOZ and SEF have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SEF is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SEF is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HOOZ.
SEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 0.00% for HOOZ.
HOOZ tracks Robinhood Markets, Inc., while SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Defiance and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HOOZ and 0.95% for SEF.
Find the right allocation for HOOZ and SEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer