PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOOW vs. XDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOOW vs. XDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOW achieves a -14.70% return, which is significantly lower than XDTE's 6.79% return.


HOOW

1D
-2.94%
1M
47.20%
YTD
-14.70%
6M
-20.92%
1Y
28.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDTE

1D
-1.35%
1M
-0.74%
YTD
6.79%
6M
5.92%
1Y
22.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOW vs. XDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HOOW and XDTE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025

0.59

The correlation between HOOW and XDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

HOOW vs. XDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HOOW
XDTE

Financial Services

3.5%
11.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Communication Services

-

10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Energy

-

3.1%

Healthcare

-

8.3%

Industrials

-

7.8%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

39.0%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Financial Services

HOOW
3.5%
XDTE
11.1%

Basic Materials

HOOW

-

XDTE
1.7%

Communication Services

HOOW

-

XDTE
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

HOOW

-

XDTE
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

HOOW

-

XDTE
4.5%

Energy

HOOW

-

XDTE
3.1%

Healthcare

HOOW

-

XDTE
8.3%

Industrials

HOOW

-

XDTE
7.8%

Real Estate

HOOW

-

XDTE
1.8%

Technology

HOOW

-

XDTE
39.0%

Utilities

HOOW

-

XDTE
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOOW vs. XDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOW
HOOW Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
HOOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOW Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOW Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

XDTE
XDTE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOW vs. XDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HOOWXDTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.35

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

2.88

-2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.76

12.61

-11.85

HOOW vs. XDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOW Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the XDTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOW and XDTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HOOW vs. XDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOW drawdown since its inception was -65.74%, which is greater than XDTE's maximum drawdown of -19.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOW and XDTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOOWXDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.74%

-19.09%

-46.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-65.74%

-7.68%

-58.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.07%

-2.52%

-39.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.96%

-2.31%

-27.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.05%

1.75%

+36.30%

Volatility

HOOW vs. XDTE - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) has a higher volatility of 28.68% compared to Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) at 4.52%. This indicates that HOOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOOWXDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.68%

4.52%

+24.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.22%

9.12%

+53.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

84.38%

11.58%

+72.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

84.14%

13.97%

+70.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

84.14%

13.97%

+70.17%

HOOW vs. XDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOOW vs. XDTE - Dividend Comparison

HOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 136.33%, more than XDTE's 33.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
HOOW
Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF
136.33%67.92%0.00%
XDTE
Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
33.21%39.16%20.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


HOOW and XDTE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOOW has higher volatility (28.68%) compared to XDTE (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOW dropped -65.74% vs XDTE's -19.09%.

On 1-year performance, HOOW leads with 28.92% vs 22.04% for XDTE. On fees, XDTE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, XDTE has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HOOW has performed better with a 28.92% return vs 22.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XDTE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for HOOW.

HOOW has the higher dividend yield at 136.33%, compared with 33.21% for XDTE.

HOOW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XDTE is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for HOOW and 0.97% for XDTE.

XDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOOW and XDTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer