HOOW vs. WMTI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HOOW (Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF) and WMTI (REX WMT Growth & Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOOW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while WMTI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

HOOW vs. WMTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOW achieves a -14.70% return, which is significantly lower than WMTI's 4.67% return.

HOOW

• 1D: -2.94%
• 1M: 47.20%
• YTD: -14.70%
• 6M: -20.92%
• 1Y: 28.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WMTI

• 1D: 1.68%
• 1M: -0.68%
• YTD: 4.67%
• 6M: 5.48%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOW vs. WMTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	-14.70%	-28.49%
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF	4.67%	9.99%

Correlation

The correlation between HOOW and WMTI is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025	-0.15

Return for Risk

HOOW vs. WMTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOW

HOOW Risk / Return Rank: 16
HOOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
HOOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
HOOW Omega Ratio Rank: 19
HOOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
HOOW Martin Ratio Rank: 12

WMTI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOW vs. WMTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HOOW	WMTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.34	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.10	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.44	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.76	—	—

Drawdowns

HOOW vs. WMTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOW drawdown since its inception was -65.74%, which is greater than WMTI's maximum drawdown of -17.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOW and WMTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOOW	WMTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.74%	-17.24%	-48.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.07%	-11.61%	-30.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.96%	-4.39%	-25.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	38.05%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HOOW	WMTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.68%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	62.22%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	84.38%	27.50%	+56.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	84.14%	27.50%	+56.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	84.14%	27.50%	+56.64%

HOOW vs. WMTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HOOW and WMTI have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

HOOW vs. WMTI - Dividend Comparison

HOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 136.33%, more than WMTI's 22.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	136.33%	67.92%
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF	22.65%	3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HOOW and WMTI in my portfolio?

HOOW and WMTI have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HOOW or WMTI?

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HOOW or WMTI?

HOOW and WMTI have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HOOW or WMTI?

HOOW has the higher dividend yield at 136.33%, compared with 22.65% for WMTI.

What is the main difference between HOOW and WMTI?

HOOW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while WMTI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and REX.