HOOW vs. HOYY
HOOW (Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF) and HOYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST HOOD ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOOW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while HOYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HOOW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for HOYY.
Performance
HOOW vs. HOYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOOW achieves a -14.70% return, which is significantly higher than HOYY's -27.39% return.
HOOW
- 1D
- -2.94%
- 1M
- 47.20%
- YTD
- -14.70%
- 6M
- -20.92%
- 1Y
- 28.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOYY
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- -27.39%
- 6M
- -33.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOOW vs. HOYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | -14.70% | -22.98% |
HOYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST HOOD ETF | -27.39% | -23.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOOW and HOYY is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOOW vs. HOYY — Risk / Return Rank
HOOW
HOYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HOOW vs. HOYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST HOOD ETF (HOYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOOW | HOYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.76 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOOW vs. HOYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOOW drawdown since its inception was -65.74%, which is greater than HOYY's maximum drawdown of -51.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOW and HOYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOOW | HOYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.74% | -51.54% | -14.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.07% | -47.99% | +5.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.96% | -33.51% | +3.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.05% | — | — |
Volatility
HOOW vs. HOYY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOOW | HOYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.68% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 84.38% | 35.82% | +48.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 84.14% | 35.82% | +48.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 84.14% | 35.82% | +48.32% |
HOOW vs. HOYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOOW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than HOYY's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOOW vs. HOYY - Dividend Comparison
HOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 136.33%, less than HOYY's 194.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | 136.33% | 67.92% |
HOYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST HOOD ETF | 194.22% | 50.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOOW and HOYY have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HOOW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HOOW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for HOYY.
HOYY has the higher dividend yield at 194.22%, compared with 136.33% for HOOW.
HOOW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while HOYY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for HOOW and 1.07% for HOYY.
Find the right allocation for HOOW and HOYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer