HOOW vs. BEG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HOOW (Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF) and BEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HOOW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BEG.

Performance

HOOW vs. BEG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOW achieves a -14.70% return, which is significantly lower than BEG's 658.88% return.

HOOW

• 1D: -2.94%
• 1M: 47.20%
• YTD: -14.70%
• 6M: -20.92%
• 1Y: 28.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BEG

• 1D: -13.66%
• 1M: 4.00%
• YTD: 658.88%
• 6M: 577.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOW vs. BEG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	-14.70%	-2.89%
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF	658.88%	1.77%

Correlation

The correlation between HOOW and BEG is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025	0.29

Return for Risk

HOOW vs. BEG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOW

HOOW Risk / Return Rank: 16
HOOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
HOOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
HOOW Omega Ratio Rank: 19
HOOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
HOOW Martin Ratio Rank: 12

BEG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOW vs. BEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HOOW	BEG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.34	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.10	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.44	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.76	—	—

Drawdowns

HOOW vs. BEG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOW drawdown since its inception was -65.74%, which is greater than BEG's maximum drawdown of -59.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOW and BEG.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOOW	BEG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.74%	-59.85%	-5.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.07%	-13.66%	-28.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.96%	-16.74%	-13.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	38.05%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HOOW	BEG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.68%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	62.22%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	84.38%	212.91%	-128.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	84.14%	212.91%	-128.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	84.14%	212.91%	-128.77%

HOOW vs. BEG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BEG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

HOOW vs. BEG - Dividend Comparison

HOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 136.33%, while BEG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	136.33%	67.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HOOW and BEG in my portfolio?

HOOW and BEG have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HOOW or BEG?

On fees, BEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HOOW or BEG?

BEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for HOOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HOOW or BEG?

HOOW has the higher dividend yield at 136.33%, compared with 0.00% for BEG.

What is the main difference between HOOW and BEG?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for HOOW and 0.75% for BEG.