HOOI vs. NRGU

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Defiance Leveraged Long + Income HOOD ETF (HOOI) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU).

HOOI and NRGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HOOI is an actively managed fund by Defiance. It was launched on Aug 18, 2025. NRGU is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). It was launched on Apr 9, 2019.

Performance

HOOI vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Leveraged Long + Income HOOD ETF (HOOI) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HOOI vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HOOI Defiance Leveraged Long + Income HOOD ETF	-10.33%	-14.45%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	139.49%	1.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOI achieves a -10.33% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 139.49% return.

HOOI

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: -10.33%
• 6M: -49.20%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NRGU

• 1D: -10.75%
• 1M: 24.81%
• YTD: 139.49%
• 6M: 107.68%
• 1Y: 69.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOI vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOI has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.

HOOI

Defiance Leveraged Long + Income HOOD ETF

NRGU

MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN

Return for Risk

HOOI vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRGU

NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 45
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 54
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOI vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Leveraged Long + Income HOOD ETF (HOOI) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HOOI	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.37	0.61	-0.98

Correlation

The correlation between HOOI and NRGU is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

HOOI vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

HOOI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 52.10%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
HOOI Defiance Leveraged Long + Income HOOD ETF	52.10%	41.26%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HOOI vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOI drawdown since its inception was -58.34%, roughly equal to the maximum NRGU drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOI and NRGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOOI	NRGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.34%	-57.50%	-0.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-55.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.31%	-17.40%	-39.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.40%	-25.38%	-9.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	27.12%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HOOI	NRGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	23.31%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	50.27%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	101.01%	88.18%	+12.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	101.01%	87.12%	+13.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	101.01%	87.12%	+13.89%