PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOOD vs. CMB1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOOD vs. CMB1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HOOD is traded in USD, while CMB1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMB1.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOD achieves a -13.24% return, which is significantly lower than CMB1.L's 17.02% return.


HOOD

1D
5.29%
1M
27.20%
YTD
-13.24%
6M
-14.87%
1Y
35.15%
3Y*
113.87%
5Y*
10Y*

CMB1.L

1D
1.03%
1M
6.84%
YTD
17.02%
6M
18.75%
1Y
37.91%
3Y*
31.24%
5Y*
19.47%
10Y*
16.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOD vs. CMB1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HOOD
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
-13.24%203.54%192.46%56.51%-54.17%-53.26%
CMB1.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)
17.02%54.68%11.37%37.57%-13.87%5.07%

Correlation

The correlation between HOOD and CMB1.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2021

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOOD vs. CMB1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOD
HOOD Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
HOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

CMB1.L
CMB1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOD vs. CMB1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HOODCMB1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.38

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

3.35

-2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.11

11.77

-10.66

HOOD vs. CMB1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOD Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOD and CMB1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HOOD vs. CMB1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOD drawdown since its inception was -90.21%, which is greater than CMB1.L's maximum drawdown of -57.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOD and CMB1.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOODCMB1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.21%

-57.87%

-32.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.26%

-11.25%

-46.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.26%

-17.48%

-39.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.64%

0.00%

-35.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.83%

-19.36%

-41.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.77%

3.20%

+28.57%

Volatility

HOOD vs. CMB1.L - Volatility Comparison

Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) has a higher volatility of 23.10% compared to iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) at 4.73%. This indicates that HOOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMB1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOODCMB1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.10%

4.73%

+18.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.29%

13.97%

+36.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.61%

17.22%

+52.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.07%

21.24%

+52.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.07%

22.73%

+51.34%

Dividends

HOOD vs. CMB1.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HOOD nor CMB1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HOOD and CMB1.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOOD and CMB1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer