HOMZ vs. SLX
HOMZ (Hoya Capital Housing ETF) and SLX (VanEck Vectors Steel ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOMZ is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Hoya Capital Housing 100 Index, while SLX is a Materials fund tracking the NYSE Arca Steel Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HOMZ returned 4.71%/yr vs 14.81%/yr for SLX. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HOMZ charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for SLX.
Performance
HOMZ vs. SLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOMZ achieves a 3.43% return, which is significantly lower than SLX's 24.43% return.
HOMZ
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- 6M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 3.43%
- 1Y
- 7.40%
- 3Y*
- 7.90%
- 5Y*
- 4.71%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.20%
SLX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 7.54%
- 6M
- 11.12%
- YTD
- 24.43%
- 1Y
- 60.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.64%
- 5Y*
- 14.81%
- 10Y*
- 16.48%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.95%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $107.42K | $133.49K | $168.14K | |
| $3.26M | $2.88M | $6.14M |
HOMZ vs. SLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOMZ Hoya Capital Housing ETF | 3.43% | 2.72% | 9.49% | 36.49% | -28.14% | 41.02% | 15.80% | 17.38% |
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF | 24.43% | 47.45% | -17.94% | 31.25% | 14.28% | 27.69% | 20.57% | -3.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOMZ and SLX is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2019 | 0.56 |
The correlation between HOMZ and SLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HOMZ vs. SLX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HOMZ
SLX
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
HOMZ
SLX
-
Consumer Cyclical
HOMZ
SLX
-
Industrials
HOMZ
SLX
Financial Services
HOMZ
SLX
-
Basic Materials
HOMZ
SLX
Consumer Defensive
HOMZ
SLX
-
Technology
HOMZ
SLX
-
Communication Services
HOMZ
SLX
-
Energy
HOMZ
-
SLX
Healthcare
HOMZ
-
SLX
-
Utilities
HOMZ
-
SLX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOMZ vs. SLX — Risk / Return Rank
HOMZ
SLX
HOMZ vs. SLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ) and VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOMZ | SLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.41 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 3.70 | -3.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.95 | 10.57 | -9.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOMZ vs. SLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOMZ drawdown since its inception was -48.10%, smaller than the maximum SLX drawdown of -82.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOMZ and SLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOMZ | SLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.10% | -82.14% | +34.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.71% | -16.35% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.91% | -27.39% | +4.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.76% | -33.62% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.56% | -7.03% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.68% | -38.48% | +28.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.83% | 5.71% | +2.12% |
Volatility
HOMZ vs. SLX - Volatility Comparison
Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) at 5.89%. This indicates that HOMZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOMZ | SLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.29% | 5.89% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.79% | 19.30% | -4.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.98% | 24.61% | -4.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 27.62% | -5.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.92% | 30.73% | -5.81% |
HOMZ vs. SLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOMZ has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SLX's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOMZ vs. SLX - Dividend Comparison
HOMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than SLX's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOMZ Hoya Capital Housing ETF | 2.61% | 2.54% | 2.13% | 2.08% | 2.03% | 1.21% | 3.18% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF | 1.25% | 1.55% | 3.56% | 2.80% | 4.97% | 7.07% | 1.87% | 3.44% | 6.26% | 2.50% | 1.06% | 5.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOMZ and SLX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOMZ has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to SLX (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOMZ dropped -48.10% vs SLX's -82.14%.
On 5-year performance, SLX leads with 14.81% vs 4.71% for HOMZ. On fees, HOMZ is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SLX has been the lower-risk option at 5.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SLX has performed better with a 14.81% return vs 4.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HOMZ is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for SLX.
HOMZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.25% for SLX.
HOMZ is categorized as Building & Construction, while SLX is Materials. HOMZ tracks Hoya Capital Housing 100 Index, while SLX tracks NYSE Arca Steel Index. They also come from different issuers: Hoya Capital and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HOMZ and 0.56% for SLX.
SLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOMZ and SLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer