HOMZ vs. DVXB
HOMZ (Hoya Capital Housing ETF) and DVXB (WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF) are both Materials funds - HOMZ tracks the Hoya Capital Housing 100 Index while DVXB tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HOMZ charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for DVXB.
Performance
HOMZ vs. DVXB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOMZ achieves a -3.23% return, which is significantly lower than DVXB's 20.01% return.
HOMZ
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- -3.23%
- 6M
- -6.20%
- 1Y
- 4.91%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.51%
- 10Y*
- —
DVXB
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 20.01%
- 6M
- 24.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOMZ vs. DVXB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOMZ Hoya Capital Housing ETF | -3.23% | -0.22% |
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF | 20.01% | -6.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOMZ and DVXB is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOMZ vs. DVXB — Risk / Return Rank
HOMZ
DVXB
HOMZ vs. DVXB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ) and WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HOMZ | DVXB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.29 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.67 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOMZ | DVXB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.48 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
HOMZ vs. DVXB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOMZ drawdown since its inception was -48.10%, which is greater than DVXB's maximum drawdown of -19.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOMZ and DVXB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOMZ | DVXB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.10% | -19.77% | -28.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.58% | -9.08% | -3.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.74% | -6.93% | -2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.35% | — | — |
Volatility
HOMZ vs. DVXB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOMZ | DVXB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.56% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.55% | 30.44% | -10.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.47% | 30.44% | -8.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.99% | 30.44% | -5.45% |
HOMZ vs. DVXB - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOMZ has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DVXB's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOMZ vs. DVXB - Dividend Comparison
HOMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, while DVXB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HOMZ Hoya Capital Housing ETF | 2.74% | 2.54% | 2.13% | 2.08% | 2.03% | 1.21% | 3.18% | 1.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOMZ and DVXB have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HOMZ is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HOMZ is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXB.
HOMZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 0.00% for DVXB.
HOMZ tracks Hoya Capital Housing 100 Index, while DVXB tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index. They also come from different issuers: Pettee Investors and WEBs. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HOMZ and 0.89% for DVXB.
Find the right allocation for HOMZ and DVXB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer