HOMZ vs. AIPO

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

HOMZ (Hoya Capital Housing ETF) and AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOMZ is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Hoya Capital Housing 100 Index, while AIPO is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, HOMZ returned 7.40% vs 46.89% for AIPO. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HOMZ charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIPO.

Performance

HOMZ vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOMZ achieves a 3.43% return, which is significantly lower than AIPO's 33.86% return.

HOMZ

• 1D: 1.80%
• 1M: -3.14%
• 6M: -0.15%
• YTD: 3.43%
• 1Y: 7.40%
• 3Y*: 7.90%
• 5Y*: 4.71%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.20%

AIPO

• 1D: 3.42%
• 1M: -4.58%
• 6M: 20.17%
• YTD: 33.86%
• 1Y: 46.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 45.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF	$42.27M	$38.04M	$47.00M
HOMZ Hoya Capital Housing ETF	$107.42K	$133.49K	$168.14K

HOMZ vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HOMZ Hoya Capital Housing ETF	3.43%	1.38%
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF	33.86%	9.46%

Correlation

The correlation between HOMZ and AIPO is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025	0.18

HOMZ vs. AIPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HOMZ	AIPO
Real Estate	39.7%	0.9%
Consumer Cyclical	34.8%	0.7%
Industrials	11.7%	58.0%
Financial Services	9.5%	2.9%
Basic Materials	3.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	-
Technology	0.6%	15.7%
Communication Services	0.5%	0.5%
Energy	-	6.8%
Healthcare	-	-
Utilities	-	15.3%

Return for Risk

HOMZ vs. AIPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HOMZ

HOMZ Risk / Return Rank: 19
HOMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
HOMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
HOMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 19
HOMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
HOMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 17

AIPO

AIPO Risk / Return Rank: 50
AIPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
AIPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
AIPO Omega Ratio Rank: 47
AIPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
AIPO Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HOMZ vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HOMZ	AIPO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	1.26	-0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.74	1.74	-1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.22	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.45	1.93	-1.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.95	6.41	-5.47

HOMZ vs. AIPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOMZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the AIPO Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOMZ and AIPO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HOMZ vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOMZ drawdown since its inception was -48.10%, which is greater than AIPO's maximum drawdown of -24.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOMZ and AIPO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOMZ	AIPO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.10%	-24.36%	-23.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.71%	-24.36%	+7.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.56%	-14.84%	+8.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.68%	-5.31%	-4.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.83%	7.33%	+0.50%

Volatility

HOMZ vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ) is 6.29%, while Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) has a volatility of 14.74%. This indicates that HOMZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HOMZ	AIPO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.29%	14.74%	-8.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.79%	29.87%	-15.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.98%	37.61%	-17.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.68%	37.27%	-15.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.92%	37.27%	-12.35%

HOMZ vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOMZ has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

HOMZ vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison

HOMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than AIPO's 0.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HOMZ Hoya Capital Housing ETF	2.61%	2.54%	2.13%	2.08%	2.03%	1.21%	3.18%	1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HOMZ and AIPO in my portfolio?

HOMZ and AIPO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HOMZ or AIPO?

AIPO has higher volatility (14.74%) compared to HOMZ (6.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOMZ dropped -48.10% vs AIPO's -24.36%.

Which ETF is better, HOMZ or AIPO?

On 1-year performance, AIPO leads with 46.89% vs 7.40% for HOMZ. On fees, HOMZ is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, HOMZ has been the lower-risk option at 6.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HOMZ or AIPO?

Over the 1-year period, AIPO has performed better with a 46.89% return vs 7.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HOMZ or AIPO?

HOMZ is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIPO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HOMZ or AIPO?

HOMZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.

What is the main difference between HOMZ and AIPO?

HOMZ is categorized as Building & Construction, while AIPO is Artificial Intelligence. HOMZ tracks Hoya Capital Housing 100 Index, while AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Hoya Capital and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HOMZ and 0.69% for AIPO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIPO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.