PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOMPX vs. NMAVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOMPX vs. NMAVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HW Opportunities MP Fund (HOMPX) and Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOMPX achieves a 15.94% return, which is significantly higher than NMAVX's 4.82% return.


HOMPX

1D
-1.46%
1M
4.39%
YTD
15.94%
6M
17.10%
1Y
26.34%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*

NMAVX

1D
-0.31%
1M
2.76%
YTD
4.82%
6M
5.15%
1Y
11.72%
3Y*
4.82%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
7.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOMPX vs. NMAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HOMPX
HW Opportunities MP Fund
15.94%11.44%3.87%29.55%-5.23%29.85%
NMAVX
Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund
4.82%1.91%5.20%6.44%-5.26%11.42%

Correlation

The correlation between HOMPX and NMAVX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021

0.70

The correlation between HOMPX and NMAVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOMPX vs. NMAVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOMPX
HOMPX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
HOMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
HOMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

NMAVX
NMAVX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
NMAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
NMAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOMPX vs. NMAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HW Opportunities MP Fund (HOMPX) and Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HOMPXNMAVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.17

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

1.16

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.88

2.97

+6.91

HOMPX vs. NMAVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOMPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the NMAVX Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOMPX and NMAVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOMPXNMAVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

0.99

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.21

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.51

+0.29

Drawdowns

HOMPX vs. NMAVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOMPX drawdown since its inception was -23.25%, smaller than the maximum NMAVX drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOMPX and NMAVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOMPXNMAVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.25%

-30.93%

+7.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-9.80%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.78%

-18.40%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.25%

-18.40%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.49%

-5.30%

+2.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.43%

-3.80%

-0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

3.83%

-1.15%

Volatility

HOMPX vs. NMAVX - Volatility Comparison

HW Opportunities MP Fund (HOMPX) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX) at 3.50%. This indicates that HOMPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMAVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOMPXNMAVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

3.50%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.29%

8.07%

+3.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.84%

11.51%

+3.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.19%

13.33%

+5.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.06%

15.04%

+4.02%

HOMPX vs. NMAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOMPX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than NMAVX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOMPX vs. NMAVX - Dividend Comparison

HOMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than NMAVX's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HOMPX
HW Opportunities MP Fund
3.12%3.61%9.48%6.79%1.89%1.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NMAVX
Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund
0.95%1.00%7.55%1.78%9.05%11.98%0.61%5.91%7.16%7.05%1.83%4.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


HOMPX and NMAVX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOMPX has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to NMAVX (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOMPX dropped -23.25% vs NMAVX's -30.93%.

HOMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOMPX and NMAVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer