HOMPX vs. HWSAX
HOMPX (HW Opportunities MP Fund) and HWSAX (Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - HOMPX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by Hotchkis & Wiley, while HWSAX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. Over the past 5 years, HOMPX returned 11.36%/yr vs 10.19%/yr for HWSAX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HOMPX charges 0.00%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for HWSAX.
Performance
HOMPX vs. HWSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOMPX achieves a 13.24% return, which is significantly lower than HWSAX's 15.33% return.
HOMPX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 13.24%
- 6M
- 13.24%
- 1Y
- 22.64%
- 3Y*
- 14.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.36%
- 10Y*
- —
HWSAX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 15.33%
- 6M
- 13.40%
- 1Y
- 23.67%
- 3Y*
- 11.09%
- 5Y*
- 10.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.59%
HOMPX vs. HWSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOMPX HW Opportunities MP Fund | 13.24% | 11.44% | 3.87% | 29.55% | -5.23% | 29.85% |
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 15.33% | 1.38% | 4.77% | 18.56% | 2.81% | 27.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOMPX and HWSAX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021 | 0.91 |
The correlation between HOMPX and HWSAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOMPX vs. HWSAX — Risk / Return Rank
HOMPX
HWSAX
HOMPX vs. HWSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HW Opportunities MP Fund (HOMPX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOMPX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.25 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 2.37 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | 7.77 | +0.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOMPX vs. HWSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOMPX drawdown since its inception was -23.25%, smaller than the maximum HWSAX drawdown of -72.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOMPX and HWSAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOMPX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.25% | -72.14% | +48.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -10.06% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.78% | -26.98% | +8.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.25% | -26.98% | +3.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.76% | -2.59% | -2.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -10.94% | +6.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 3.07% | -0.26% |
Volatility
HOMPX vs. HWSAX - Volatility Comparison
HW Opportunities MP Fund (HOMPX) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX) at 3.98%. This indicates that HOMPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOMPX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.30% | 3.98% | +1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | 11.14% | +0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.95% | 17.15% | -2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 21.49% | -2.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.03% | 24.61% | -5.58% |
HOMPX vs. HWSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOMPX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than HWSAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOMPX vs. HWSAX - Dividend Comparison
HOMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than HWSAX's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOMPX HW Opportunities MP Fund | 3.19% | 3.61% | 9.48% | 6.79% | 1.89% | 1.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 0.60% | 0.69% | 8.19% | 1.79% | 13.39% | 0.22% | 0.63% | 4.62% | 9.45% | 4.80% | 0.00% | 11.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOMPX and HWSAX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOMPX has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to HWSAX (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOMPX dropped -23.25% vs HWSAX's -72.14%.
HOMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOMPX and HWSAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer