PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOMPX vs. FSLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOMPX vs. FSLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HW Opportunities MP Fund (HOMPX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOMPX achieves a 18.91% return, which is significantly lower than FSLSX's 21.04% return.


HOMPX

1D
2.38%
1M
8.54%
YTD
18.91%
6M
21.58%
1Y
30.84%
3Y*
17.58%
5Y*
11.26%
10Y*

FSLSX

1D
0.33%
1M
3.49%
YTD
21.04%
6M
13.49%
1Y
29.88%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
11.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOMPX vs. FSLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HOMPX
HW Opportunities MP Fund
18.91%11.44%3.87%29.55%-5.23%29.85%
FSLSX
Fidelity Value Strategies Fund
21.04%0.24%9.25%20.54%-7.37%32.12%

Correlation

The correlation between HOMPX and FSLSX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021

0.87

The correlation between HOMPX and FSLSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOMPX vs. FSLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOMPX
HOMPX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
HOMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
HOMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FSLSX
FSLSX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FSLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOMPX vs. FSLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HW Opportunities MP Fund (HOMPX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HOMPXFSLSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.09

1.73

+0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.88

2.30

+0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.32

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

3.32

-0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.25

10.82

+0.42

HOMPX vs. FSLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOMPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the FSLSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOMPX and FSLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOMPXFSLSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

1.73

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.45

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.54

+0.30

Drawdowns

HOMPX vs. FSLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOMPX drawdown since its inception was -23.25%, smaller than the maximum FSLSX drawdown of -69.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOMPX and FSLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOMPXFSLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.25%

-69.87%

+46.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-9.79%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.78%

-26.81%

+8.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.25%

-26.81%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.43%

-8.28%

+3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.99%

-0.31%

Volatility

HOMPX vs. FSLSX - Volatility Comparison

HW Opportunities MP Fund (HOMPX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) have volatilities of 4.33% and 4.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOMPXFSLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

4.27%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.16%

14.50%

-3.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.74%

18.78%

-4.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.18%

20.50%

-1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.05%

21.92%

-2.87%

HOMPX vs. FSLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOMPX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FSLSX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOMPX vs. FSLSX - Dividend Comparison

HOMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, while FSLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSLSX
Fidelity Value Strategies Fund
0.00%0.00%10.41%2.49%2.13%7.29%0.84%4.84%14.59%6.57%19.71%1.26%
HOMPX
HW Opportunities MP Fund
3.04%3.61%9.48%6.79%1.89%1.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HOMPX and FSLSX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOMPX has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to FSLSX (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOMPX dropped -23.25% vs FSLSX's -69.87%.

HOMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOMPX and FSLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer