HOLA vs. UGA
HOLA (JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - HOLA is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. HOLA is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. HOLA charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
HOLA vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOLA achieves a 3.32% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 70.24% return.
HOLA
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- 3.32%
- 6M
- 5.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UGA
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -8.27%
- YTD
- 70.24%
- 6M
- 58.79%
- 1Y
- 76.65%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- 24.35%
- 10Y*
- 14.20%
HOLA vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 3.32% | 7.55% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 70.24% | -2.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOLA and UGA is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | -0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOLA vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
HOLA
UGA
HOLA vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOLA | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 0.12 | +1.20 |
Drawdowns
HOLA vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOLA drawdown since its inception was -6.99%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOLA and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOLA | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.99% | -86.59% | +79.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.46% | -14.98% | +12.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.45% | -36.75% | +35.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.27% | — |
Volatility
HOLA vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOLA | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 30.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.52% | 35.21% | -25.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.52% | 34.39% | -24.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.52% | 37.27% | -27.75% |
HOLA vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOLA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOLA vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
HOLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 2.92% | 3.02% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOLA and UGA have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HOLA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HOLA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
HOLA has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
HOLA is categorized as Equity Hedged, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HOLA and 0.75% for UGA.
Find the right allocation for HOLA and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer