HOLA vs. IFLO
HOLA (JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) and IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOLA is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while IFLO is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by VictoryShares. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HOLA charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for IFLO.
Performance
HOLA vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOLA achieves a 3.91% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 20.11% return.
HOLA
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 3.91%
- 6M
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFLO
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 6.05%
- YTD
- 20.11%
- 6M
- 22.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOLA vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 3.91% | 7.55% |
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 20.11% | 10.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOLA and IFLO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.77 |
HOLA vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HOLA
IFLO
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
HOLA
IFLO
Industrials
HOLA
IFLO
Technology
HOLA
IFLO
Healthcare
HOLA
IFLO
Consumer Defensive
HOLA
IFLO
Consumer Cyclical
HOLA
IFLO
Basic Materials
HOLA
IFLO
Communication Services
HOLA
IFLO
Utilities
HOLA
IFLO
Energy
HOLA
IFLO
Real Estate
HOLA
IFLO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOLA vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOLA | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.40 | 2.75 | -1.35 |
Drawdowns
HOLA vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOLA drawdown since its inception was -6.99%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOLA and IFLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOLA | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.99% | -6.44% | -0.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.91% | 0.00% | -1.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.45% | -1.22% | -0.23% |
Volatility
HOLA vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOLA | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.50% | 14.17% | -4.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.50% | 14.17% | -4.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.50% | 14.17% | -4.67% |
HOLA vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOLA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOLA vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison
HOLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than IFLO's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 2.91% | 3.02% |
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.02% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOLA and IFLO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HOLA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HOLA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.
HOLA has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 1.02% for IFLO.
HOLA is categorized as Equity Hedged, while IFLO is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HOLA and 0.56% for IFLO.
Find the right allocation for HOLA and IFLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer