PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOLA vs. IFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOLA vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOLA achieves a 3.91% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 20.11% return.


HOLA

1D
-0.22%
1M
1.62%
YTD
3.91%
6M
5.59%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IFLO

1D
0.35%
1M
6.05%
YTD
20.11%
6M
22.78%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOLA vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HOLA and IFLO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

0.77

HOLA vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HOLA
IFLO

Financial Services

23.9%
0.9%

Industrials

15.5%
18.9%

Technology

11.9%
18.1%

Healthcare

9.5%
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
14.0%

Basic Materials

5.2%
11.6%

Communication Services

3.1%
6.2%

Utilities

2.7%
1.2%

Energy

2.6%
13.6%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.0%

Financial Services

HOLA
23.9%
IFLO
0.9%

Industrials

HOLA
15.5%
IFLO
18.9%

Technology

HOLA
11.9%
IFLO
18.1%

Healthcare

HOLA
9.5%
IFLO
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

HOLA
6.5%
IFLO
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

HOLA
6.2%
IFLO
14.0%

Basic Materials

HOLA
5.2%
IFLO
11.6%

Communication Services

HOLA
3.1%
IFLO
6.2%

Utilities

HOLA
2.7%
IFLO
1.2%

Energy

HOLA
2.6%
IFLO
13.6%

Real Estate

HOLA
1.0%
IFLO
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOLA vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HOLA vs. IFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOLAIFLODifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.40

2.75

-1.35

Drawdowns

HOLA vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOLA drawdown since its inception was -6.99%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOLA and IFLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOLAIFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.99%

-6.44%

-0.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

0.00%

-1.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-1.22%

-0.23%

Volatility

HOLA vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOLAIFLODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.50%

14.17%

-4.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.50%

14.17%

-4.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.50%

14.17%

-4.67%

HOLA vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOLA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOLA vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison

HOLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than IFLO's 1.02% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


HOLA and IFLO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HOLA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HOLA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.

HOLA has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 1.02% for IFLO.

HOLA is categorized as Equity Hedged, while IFLO is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HOLA and 0.56% for IFLO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOLA and IFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer