HOLA vs. IFLO

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

HOLA (JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) and IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOLA is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while IFLO is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by VictoryShares. Over the past year, HOLA returned 13.85% vs 33.15% for IFLO. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HOLA charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for IFLO.

Performance

HOLA vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOLA achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 18.73% return.

HOLA

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 1.53%
• 6M: 1.89%
• YTD: 5.36%
• 1Y: 13.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IFLO

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -0.54%
• 6M: 15.77%
• YTD: 18.73%
• 1Y: 33.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOLA vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	5.36%	7.60%
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF	18.73%	11.13%

Correlation

The correlation between HOLA and IFLO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025	0.76

The correlation between HOLA and IFLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

HOLA vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HOLA	IFLO
Financial Services	25.7%	1.1%
Industrials	18.5%	18.1%
Technology	12.2%	21.5%
Healthcare	10.1%	11.7%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	13.8%
Consumer Defensive	6.6%	2.8%
Basic Materials	5.4%	11.3%
Communication Services	4.4%	6.7%
Utilities	4.3%	1.0%
Energy	3.4%	12.1%
Real Estate	1.0%	0.0%

Return for Risk

HOLA vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOLA

HOLA Risk / Return Rank: 52
HOLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
HOLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
HOLA Omega Ratio Rank: 50
HOLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
HOLA Martin Ratio Rank: 51

IFLO

IFLO Risk / Return Rank: 90
IFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
IFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
IFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 87
IFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
IFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOLA vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HOLA	IFLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	2.29	-0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	3.33	-1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.41	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.99	5.17	-3.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.62	17.35	-10.73

HOLA vs. IFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOLA Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the IFLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOLA and IFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HOLA vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOLA drawdown since its inception was -6.99%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOLA and IFLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOLA	IFLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.99%	-6.44%	-0.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.99%	-6.44%	-0.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.47%	-1.89%	+0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.41%	-1.30%	-0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	1.92%	+0.18%

Volatility

HOLA vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) at 3.18%. This indicates that HOLA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HOLA	IFLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.93%	3.18%	+0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.05%	12.01%	-3.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.93%	14.55%	-4.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.92%	14.51%	-4.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.92%	14.51%	-4.59%

HOLA vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOLA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

HOLA vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison

HOLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than IFLO's 1.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	2.87%	3.02%
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF	1.57%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HOLA and IFLO in my portfolio?

HOLA and IFLO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HOLA or IFLO?

HOLA has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to IFLO (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOLA dropped -6.99% vs IFLO's -6.44%.

Which ETF is better, HOLA or IFLO?

On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 33.15% vs 13.85% for HOLA. On fees, HOLA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IFLO has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HOLA or IFLO?

Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 33.15% return vs 13.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HOLA or IFLO?

HOLA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HOLA or IFLO?

HOLA has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 1.57% for IFLO.

What is the main difference between HOLA and IFLO?

HOLA is categorized as Equity Hedged, while IFLO is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HOLA and 0.56% for IFLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.