PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOLA vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOLA vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOLA achieves a 6.50% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.67% return.


HOLA

1D
0.46%
1M
2.68%
YTD
6.50%
6M
6.01%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BIL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.67%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.84%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
2.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOLA vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HOLA and BIL is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOLA vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOLA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOLA vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HOLABILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

87.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

352.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2,793.11

HOLA vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HOLA vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOLA drawdown since its inception was -6.99%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOLA and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOLABILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.99%

-0.78%

-6.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.44%

-0.26%

-1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

Volatility

HOLA vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOLABILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.90%

0.20%

+9.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.90%

0.26%

+9.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.90%

0.26%

+9.64%

HOLA vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOLA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOLA vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

HOLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than BIL's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.85%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%
HOLA
JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF
2.84%3.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HOLA and BIL have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HOLA.

BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 2.84% for HOLA.

HOLA is categorized as Equity Hedged, while BIL is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HOLA and 0.14% for BIL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOLA and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer