HOII vs. BNO
HOII (REX HOOD Growth & Income ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - HOII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. HOII is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. HOII charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BNO.
Performance
HOII vs. BNO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOII achieves a 19,132.59% return, which is significantly higher than BNO's 65.18% return.
HOII
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 26,786.58%
- 6M
- 19,292.59%
- YTD
- 19,132.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNO
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- 6.58%
- 6M
- 58.17%
- YTD
- 65.18%
- 1Y
- 55.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.77%
- 5Y*
- 19.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.78%
HOII vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOII REX HOOD Growth & Income ETF | 19,132.59% | -23.54% |
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 65.18% | -4.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOII and BNO is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025 | -0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOII vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank
HOII
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BNO
HOII vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX HOOD Growth & Income ETF (HOII) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOII | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.61 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.66 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOII vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOII drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOII and BNO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOII | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.38% | -87.06% | +31.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -34.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -22.20% | +22.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.68% | -40.06% | +3.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.87% | — |
Volatility
HOII vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOII | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 39.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34,045.59% | 42.74% | +34,002.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34,045.59% | 36.11% | +34,009.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34,045.59% | 36.77% | +34,008.82% |
HOII vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOII vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison
Neither HOII nor BNO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HOII REX HOOD Growth & Income ETF | 120.87% | 4.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOII and BNO have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HOII is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HOII is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.
HOII has the higher dividend yield at 120.87%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.
HOII is categorized as Derivative Income, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: REX and USCF Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for HOII and 1.00% for BNO.
Find the right allocation for HOII and BNO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer