HOD.TO vs. QQCL.TO
HOD.TO (BetaPro Crude Oil Inverse Leveraged Daily Bear ETF) and QQCL.TO (Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOD.TO is a Inverse Commodities fund actively managed by Global X, while QQCL.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HOD.TO returned -70.02% vs 42.71% for QQCL.TO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HOD.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOD.TO achieves a -70.59% return, which is significantly lower than QQCL.TO's 24.17% return.
HOD.TO
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 41.19%
- YTD
- -70.59%
- 6M
- -70.13%
- 1Y
- -70.02%
- 3Y*
- -47.08%
- 5Y*
- -48.11%
- 10Y*
- -37.53%
QQCL.TO
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- 4.61%
- YTD
- 24.17%
- 6M
- 23.29%
- 1Y
- 42.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOD.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HOD.TO BetaPro Crude Oil Inverse Leveraged Daily Bear ETF | -70.59% | -6.76% | -33.08% | 26.09% |
QQCL.TO Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF | 24.17% | 13.10% | 41.38% | 4.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOD.TO and QQCL.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2023 | 0.05 |
The correlation between HOD.TO and QQCL.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOD.TO vs. QQCL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HOD.TO
QQCL.TO
HOD.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro Crude Oil Inverse Leveraged Daily Bear ETF (HOD.TO) and Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOD.TO | QQCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.43 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 4.01 | -4.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.52 | 14.50 | -16.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOD.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOD.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.88%, which is greater than QQCL.TO's maximum drawdown of -25.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOD.TO and QQCL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOD.TO | QQCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.88% | -25.63% | -74.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -85.78% | -10.70% | -75.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -92.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.77% | 0.00% | -99.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.61% | -3.29% | -80.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.27% | 2.95% | +43.32% |
Volatility
HOD.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Volatility Comparison
BetaPro Crude Oil Inverse Leveraged Daily Bear ETF (HOD.TO) has a higher volatility of 22.25% compared to Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO) at 9.02%. This indicates that HOD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQCL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOD.TO | QQCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.25% | 9.02% | +13.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 77.63% | 14.94% | +62.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.85% | 17.85% | +66.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.83% | 20.77% | +54.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.29% | 20.77% | +61.52% |
Dividends
HOD.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Dividend Comparison
HOD.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HOD.TO BetaPro Crude Oil Inverse Leveraged Daily Bear ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQCL.TO Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF | 12.99% | 14.54% | 11.87% | 3.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOD.TO and QQCL.TO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOD.TO is categorized as Inverse Commodities, while QQCL.TO is Nasdaq-100.
Find the right allocation for HOD.TO and QQCL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer