HOCT vs. KLIP
HOCT (Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October) and KLIP (KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Options Trading funds. HOCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KLIP.
Performance
HOCT vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HOCT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KLIP
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- -7.94%
- 6M
- -9.28%
- 1Y
- 1.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOCT vs. KLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% |
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF | -11.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOCT vs. KLIP — Risk / Return Rank
HOCT
KLIP
HOCT vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOCT | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.35 | — |
Drawdowns
HOCT vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOCT drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum KLIP drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOCT and KLIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOCT | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -18.61% | +18.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -13.22% | +13.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -3.79% | +3.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.70% | — |
Volatility
HOCT vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOCT | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 15.84% | -15.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 18.13% | -18.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 18.13% | -18.13% |
HOCT vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than KLIP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOCT vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison
HOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KLIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF | 28.17% | 25.14% | 54.26% | 61.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, HOCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HOCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KLIP.
KLIP has the higher dividend yield at 28.17%, compared with 0.00% for HOCT.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for HOCT and 0.95% for KLIP.
Find the right allocation for HOCT and KLIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer