HOCT vs. KLIP
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP).
HOCT and KLIP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HOCT is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Sep 29, 2023. KLIP is managed by CICC. It was launched on Jan 12, 2023.
Performance
HOCT vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HOCT vs. KLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% |
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF | -12.00% |
Returns By Period
HOCT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KLIP
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -5.77%
- YTD
- -8.98%
- 6M
- -12.63%
- 1Y
- -1.25%
- 3Y*
- 7.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HOCT vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than KLIP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HOCT vs. KLIP — Risk / Return Rank
HOCT
KLIP
HOCT vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOCT | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.35 | — |
Dividends
HOCT vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison
HOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KLIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.24%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF | 28.24% | 25.14% | 54.26% | 61.22% |
Drawdowns
HOCT vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOCT drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum KLIP drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOCT and KLIP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOCT | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -18.61% | +18.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -14.21% | +14.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -3.34% | +3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.18% | — |
Volatility
HOCT vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HOCT | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 19.76% | -19.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 18.19% | -18.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 18.19% | -18.19% |