HOCT vs. IFEB
HOCT (Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October) and IFEB (Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. HOCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for IFEB.
Performance
HOCT vs. IFEB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HOCT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFEB
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 2.84%
- 6M
- 3.95%
- 1Y
- 10.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOCT vs. IFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% |
IFEB Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February | 1.07% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOCT vs. IFEB — Risk / Return Rank
HOCT
IFEB
HOCT vs. IFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT) and Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOCT | IFEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.05 | — |
Drawdowns
HOCT vs. IFEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOCT drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum IFEB drawdown of -8.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOCT and IFEB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOCT | IFEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -8.84% | +8.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.41% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -1.68% | +1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.58% | — |
Volatility
HOCT vs. IFEB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOCT | IFEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 7.55% | -7.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 9.09% | -9.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 9.09% | -9.09% |
HOCT vs. IFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than IFEB's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOCT vs. IFEB - Dividend Comparison
Neither HOCT nor IFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, HOCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HOCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IFEB.
HOCT and IFEB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.79% for HOCT and 0.85% for IFEB.
Find the right allocation for HOCT and IFEB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer