HOCT vs. BSTP
HOCT (Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October) and BSTP (Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. HOCT is actively managed, while BSTP is passively managed. HOCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for BSTP.
Performance
HOCT vs. BSTP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HOCT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSTP
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 3.05%
- YTD
- 6.07%
- 6M
- 6.56%
- 1Y
- 16.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOCT vs. BSTP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% |
BSTP Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF | 4.99% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOCT vs. BSTP — Risk / Return Rank
HOCT
BSTP
HOCT vs. BSTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT) and Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF (BSTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOCT | BSTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.91 | — |
Drawdowns
HOCT vs. BSTP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOCT drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum BSTP drawdown of -16.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOCT and BSTP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOCT | BSTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -16.69% | +16.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.32% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -3.52% | +3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.27% | — |
Volatility
HOCT vs. BSTP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOCT | BSTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 7.93% | -7.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 12.11% | -12.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 12.11% | -12.11% |
HOCT vs. BSTP - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BSTP's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOCT vs. BSTP - Dividend Comparison
Neither HOCT nor BSTP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, HOCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HOCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BSTP.
HOCT and BSTP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.79% for HOCT and 0.89% for BSTP.
Find the right allocation for HOCT and BSTP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer