PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HNSC.L vs. QDVE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HNSC.L vs. QDVE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF USD (HNSC.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HNSC.L is traded in USD, while QDVE.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the QDVE.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HNSC.L achieves a 92.27% return, which is significantly higher than QDVE.DE's 22.64% return.


HNSC.L

1D
-3.06%
1M
20.19%
YTD
92.27%
6M
94.54%
1Y
191.57%
3Y*
62.69%
5Y*
10Y*

QDVE.DE

1D
-2.14%
1M
13.13%
YTD
22.64%
6M
22.72%
1Y
51.83%
3Y*
34.38%
5Y*
24.17%
10Y*
26.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HNSC.L vs. QDVE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HNSC.L
HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF USD
92.27%55.83%17.71%50.92%-18.53%
QDVE.DE
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
22.64%24.17%37.76%59.01%-22.38%

Correlation

The correlation between HNSC.L and QDVE.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2022

0.60

The correlation between HNSC.L and QDVE.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HNSC.L vs. QDVE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HNSC.L
HNSC.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
HNSC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HNSC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
HNSC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
HNSC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
HNSC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVE.DE
QDVE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QDVE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HNSC.L vs. QDVE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF USD (HNSC.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HNSC.LQDVE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.73

1.40

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.69

3.13

+9.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

45.66

9.51

+36.15

HNSC.L vs. QDVE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HNSC.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.71, which is higher than the QDVE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HNSC.L and QDVE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HNSC.LQDVE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.71

2.53

+3.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.61

1.11

+0.50

Drawdowns

HNSC.L vs. QDVE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HNSC.L drawdown since its inception was -39.32%, which is greater than QDVE.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HNSC.L and QDVE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HNSC.LQDVE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.32%

-33.62%

-5.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.99%

-16.47%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.21%

-26.14%

-11.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.06%

-3.23%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.51%

-5.95%

-3.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.18%

5.43%

-1.25%

Volatility

HNSC.L vs. QDVE.DE - Volatility Comparison

HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF USD (HNSC.L) has a higher volatility of 14.26% compared to iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE) at 7.19%. This indicates that HNSC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HNSC.LQDVE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.26%

7.19%

+7.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.25%

15.24%

+11.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.32%

20.38%

+12.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.74%

23.40%

+14.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.74%

22.02%

+15.72%

HNSC.L vs. QDVE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

HNSC.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVE.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

HNSC.L vs. QDVE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither HNSC.L nor QDVE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HNSC.L and QDVE.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDVE.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVE.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HNSC.L.

HNSC.L is categorized as Semiconductors, while QDVE.DE is Technology Equities. HNSC.L tracks Nasdaq Global Semiconductor, while QDVE.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HNSC.L and 0.15% for QDVE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HNSC.L and QDVE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer